Will Smith v Chris Rock

Mock someone's significant others health condition and expect a slap, let alone in front of a global audience and your peers. Think he's been pushed enough RE: his wife. 🤷‍♂️

The cynic in me wonders if its staged to build him some credibility up after he's been widely mocked for the fact his wife sleeps with other guys and he just sucks it up.

Those saying you just can't do that etc. I'd have to disagree, violence isn't the answer but we don't live in a perfect world and if you spout off not everyone is going to have a reasoned debate with you over it.
It’s just comedy though, if someone can’t take a bit of a joke they probably shouldn’t leave the house

Go to any comedy show and you would get much worse if you were sat in the first few rows
 
Maybe the joke was in bad taste, but if that justifies the reaction by WS, then Ricky Gervais would have been murdered 100 times over, after his Golden Globe gags.

Thought Chris Rock handled it OK all thing considered, Will Smith the opposite, but then he's a bit of an odd-ball anyway I think, as most scientologists tend to be.
 
Looked staged to me, too.
Oscars don't get the publicity they used in the age of mass social media so it would not surprise me to hear this was an orchestrated stunt.
 
Bit of an odd one given the history of the Smith family.

Chris Rock and Jada have worked together on 3 films, so they know each other. When the joke was made, Jada rolled her eyes and Will laughed, seemed to be fine. And then, a change and up he goes and slaps him. I think Chris thought that with his working relationship with Jada and the fact she has been so open about talking about her condition, that the joke would be just that, not intended with any malice. Apparently not.

Jada screwing a 20 year old and then making a TV miniseries basically saying she was in love and defending it is fine, but a comedian making a joke gets Will riled up. Just seems odd.

And as above, its not a message to be sending kids that this kind of response is OK. I've never been Smiths biggest fan, his interviews just come across as PR managed, I think this is the first time we've ever seen his real character.
 
Last edited:
I think will smith is an odd ball, looking at his wife on the red carpet before the show started she looked in quite a state then, very timid and subservient to Smith. I wouldn't be surprised at all to hear there are control issues and maybe even DV within that relationship.
 
Is it popular to dislike popular things? People have their own tastes and the majority of the world population would choose the latest Avengers film over Belfast for example so I'd say takings at box office is a very good barometer and also sales down the lin
Aye and more people watch Coronation St and Eastenders than anything else but you wouldnt say that was better tv just because they top the ratings.

There are awards for the most popular films. TV Times Awards etc. My point is that whilst I wouldnt have a clue what happened in the 7th movie of the Spiderman franchise for example because they are pretty much all the same, the film Belfast, even if its not your cup of tea, was brilliantly made and thought provoking and will have a lasting legacy on the industry in years to come.
 
I think will smith is an odd ball, looking at his wife on the red carpet before the show started she looked in quite a state then, very timid and subservient to Smith. I wouldn't be surprised at all to hear there are control issues and maybe even DV within that relationship.
You need to read into the history of their relationship, you might then think that the positions are reversed.
 
They're definitely not formulaic. One of the reasons they're so popular is because they're inventive and try different things.

Many thought Guardians of the Galaxy was ridiculously bold. Not a well known comic and featuring a talking raccoon and talking tree. It could have gone very wrong. Yet it's one of the best films they made and one of the best sci-fi films of the last decade at least.

Black Panther speaks for itself

Winter soldier is more a spy thriller than anything else.

Ragnarok isn't far off being an outright comedy.

Most of the films they try and do something different with. Not to mention trying to hang it all together in one shared universe. Nothing had ever been done on that scale before.

Some of the criticism is valid, they can be cheesy at times, they can be far fetched (but then superheroes so duh) and some of them have fallen flat obviously.

But formulaic? Not remotely. I think they've done an incredible job in terms of ambition and trying new things.

For Hollywood action blockbusters most of them are as good as it gets.
Fair enough you're a fan of the films clearly. First of all I will say I dislike the superhero Marvel franchise genre. There are reams of discussion on line about it ever since Scorcese called them lazy film making.

I get their popularity though and their cinematic excellence. But I would say they are formulaic in as much as all film genres are formulaic in some way. Rom Coms, anti war films etc. Formulas work. Thats why they attract audiences. Doesn't necessarily make them great films. Wasn't the rom com films of Adam Sandler or Jennifer Anniston always guaranteed top box office takings. Not great films but captured the attention of the paying cinema goer. Depends what you want. But formulaic they are.
 
Formulaic, money spinning film making and technically brilliant but I can’t remember one from the other. The musical scores are great though. Thanks to Hans Zimmer who won the Oscar overnight for Dune.
It must be a very complicated formula they are using.
 
It is about art and art is pretentious. It's super pretentious to decide what the "best" film is and completely exclude specific categories. How do you define "Best actor" or "Best film". Surely if the majority of people couldn't sit through it because it is too boring then it can't ever be considered to be the best but it often is by the awards. Comedies never get nominated, nor does action but it is a skill that very few people can get right. Why does best have to mean most realistic/serious?

There are films made to make money and films made to win awards. They appeal to a specific group of people. The films made to win awards are only possible because of the films made to make money so I think there should be some more respect given to the films that people actually enjoy watching.

However, to quote Super Hans: "People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people, Jeremy".
 
Aye and more people watch Coronation St and Eastenders than anything else but you wouldnt say that was better tv just because they top the ratings.

There are awards for the most popular films. TV Times Awards etc. My point is that whilst I wouldnt have a clue what happened in the 7th movie of the Spiderman franchise for example because they are pretty much all the same, the film Belfast, even if its not your cup of tea, was brilliantly made and thought provoking and will have a lasting legacy on the industry in years to come.
Arent football matches usually some of the highest viewing figures - maybe one of the Boro's cup wins will get nominated (for a BAFTA anyway) in next years awards season ;)
 
My wife's initial reaction to this was why did he feel he had to get up and assault someone to try and defend his wife from a 'joke', regardless of how unfunny you may find it.

Doesn't look great for the supposed Mr Nice Guy look Will Smith has always gone for.
 
Fair enough you're a fan of the films clearly. First of all I will say I dislike the superhero Marvel franchise genre. There are reams of discussion on line about it ever since Scorcese called them lazy film making.

I get their popularity though and their cinematic excellence. But I would say they are formulaic in as much as all film genres are formulaic in some way. Rom Coms, anti war films etc. Formulas work. Thats why they attract audiences. Doesn't necessarily make them great films. Wasn't the rom com films of Adam Sandler or Jennifer Anniston always guaranteed top box office takings. Not great films but captured the attention of the paying cinema goer. Depends what you want. But formulaic they are.
All about opinions obviously but I'd argue you've undermined your own point as the marvel films don't all sit under one genre. You seem to be saying their formulaic because all films under one genre tend to be formulaic. But the marvel films don't all sit under one genre.

Some are sci-fi, some are thrillers, some are comedies. There's a war movie in there, a martial arts film etc etc.

I just don't see how they, as a whole, are formulaic. Some of them maybe (avengers, iron man sequels perhaps) but there is a hell of a lot of variety too.

But then if you're not a fan, it's unlikely you've watched most of them and are just lumping them all together as "superhero" movies. Which I think is inaccurate.

Fair enough if you don't like them, be boring if we all liked the same stuff. I just think think accusations of them being "all the same" tend to come from people who have already decided they don't like them because of the premise. As opposed to being based on judging them on their own merits.

Not saying this applies to you. If you've sat through the likes of Guardians, Ragnarok, Black Panther, Winter Soldier and the original Iron Man etc. and felt they were all pretty much from the same formula then fair enough. We disagree.

(can't believe I've written that much, must be bored 🤦‍♂️😂. Maybe I should have just wrote "How dare you insult the marvel films").
 
It’s just comedy though, if someone can’t take a bit of a joke they probably shouldn’t leave the house

Go to any comedy show and you would get much worse if you were sat in the first few rows
I go to a lot of live comedy, and I've had the **** ripped out of me on many occasions. I've never seen a comic make such a lazy cheap shot about a medical condition before, and if they tried that in a small comedy club then I can assure you they'd get more than an open-handed slap.
 
All about opinions obviously but I'd argue you've undermined your own point as the marvel films don't all sit under one genre. You seem to be saying their formulaic because all films under one genre tend to be formulaic. But the marvel films don't all sit under one genre.

Some are sci-fi, some are thrillers, some are comedies. There's a war movie in there, a martial arts film etc etc.

I just don't see how they, as a whole, are formulaic. Some of them maybe (avengers, iron man sequels perhaps) but there is a hell of a lot of variety too.

But then if you're not a fan, it's unlikely you've watched most of them and are just lumping them all together as "superhero" movies. Which I think is inaccurate.

Fair enough if you don't like them, be boring if we all liked the same stuff. I just think think accusations of them being "all the same" tend to come from people who have already decided they don't like them because of the premise. As opposed to being based on judging them on their own merits.

Not saying this applies to you. If you've sat through the likes of Guardians, Ragnarok, Black Panther, Winter Soldier and the original Iron Man etc. and felt they were all pretty much from the same formula then fair enough. We disagree.

(can't believe I've written that much, must be bored 🤦‍♂️😂. Maybe I should have just wrote "How dare you insult the marvel films").
Maybe you should. 😂 As you say it’s all about opinions but the general premise that started off this discussion was that “the best films are the ones that top the ratings and should win the awards” is nonsense. In my opinion.
 
Back
Top