The 9am figures not disclosed yet?

Today's headline analysis:

• 827 new cases reported in 24-hour period, up from yesterday's 687
• 7-day average for new cases increases by 0.2% to 610 per day, following 4.3% increase yesterday
• 7-day average for new cases is 5.4% higher than one week ago (from 10.6% higher yesterday) and 14.2% lower than two weeks ago (from 18.7% lower yesterday and 39.7% lower 7 days ago)
• 40 new deaths in all settings reported in 24-hour period, down from 114 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths in all settings decreases by 18.5% to 68 per day, following 12.8% increase yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths in all settings is 20.8% lower than one week ago (from 12.3% higher yesterday) and 30.7% lower than two weeks ago (from 18.8% lower yesterday and 26.5% lower 7 days ago)
 
bear66 said:
827 positive tests today with 190 Pillar 1.

Estimates of those who have died have officially been paused. There were 11 deaths in English hospitals.
Click to expand...

Is the increase in new cases due to track and trace being more focused so more likely to pick up new cases or that we are heading in the wrong direction ?
 
Brewtal said:
Is the increase in new cases due to track and trace being more focused so more likely to pick up new cases or that we are heading in the wrong direction ?
Click to expand...
The Pillar 1 are historically more serious and they are beginning to increase but not to levels of 3-4 weeks ago. There hasn't been daily admission data for 9 days, but hospital numbers are still falling as are ICU cases.
 
bear66 said:
Thanks for that.
Click to expand...
It was apparently still posted up. A lot of folk who have been compiling stats like yourself though have said it's all guesswork now till the ONS figures are released. Some say it could take weeks before we know a true number.
 
RandySavage said:
It was apparently still posted up. A lot of folk who have been compiling stats like yourself though have said it's all guesswork now till the ONS figures are released. Some say it could take weeks before we know a true number.
Click to expand...
That's where I am. At least the ONS are using one metric that's well documented. But, as you say, weeks out of date.
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 726 new cases reported in 24-hour period, down from yesterday's 827
• 7-day average for new cases increases by 1.8% to 621 per day, following 0.2% increase yesterday (and 6th increase in the past 9 days)
• 7-day average for new cases is 3.8% higher than one week ago (from 5.4% higher yesterday) and 5.3% lower than two weeks ago (from 14.2% lower yesterday and 34.6% lower 7 days ago)
• 27 new deaths in all settings reported in 24-hour period, down from 40 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths in all settings increases by 1.3% to 68 per day, following 18.5% decrease yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths in all settings is 19.7% lower than one week ago (from 20.8% lower yesterday) and 28.3% lower than two weeks ago (from 30.7% lower yesterday and 26.0% lower 7 days ago)
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 580 new cases reported in 24-hour period, down from yesterday's 726
• 7-day average for new cases increases by 1.1% to 628 per day, following 1.8% increase yesterday (and 7th increase in the past 10 days)
• 7-day average for new cases is 0.8% higher than one week ago (from 3.8% higher yesterday) and 6.5% higher than two weeks ago (from 5.3% lower yesterday and 30.2% lower 7 days ago)
• 11 new deaths in all settings reported in 24-hour period, down from 27 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths in all settings remains unchanged at 69 per day, following 1.3% increase yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths in all settings is 19.0% lower than one week ago (from 19.7% lower yesterday) and 27.3% lower than two weeks ago (from 28.3% lower yesterday and 27.5% lower 7 days ago)
 
It's very odd Randy considering we're still being told hundreds are dying every week of the virus alone.
If it were officially over, it would make sense that you'd see a period of below average levels due to the average age of those who sadly passed away but we're still in the midst of it.
It does worry me that if we're acting like this now whilst less people are dying than normal... What will happen if there's a small spike in winter?!
 
Perhaps Randy, and I don't know, are the weekly mortality rates from covid 19 statistically significant on weekly deaths? I don't know. It is currently about 2-3 hundred so a small percentage of the overall deaths.
 
Laughing said:
Perhaps Randy, and I don't know, are the weekly mortality rates from covid 19 statistically significant on weekly deaths? I don't know. It is currently about 2-3 hundred so a small percentage of the overall deaths.
Click to expand...

Dude the mortality rate is running below average during a time where the mortality rate has actually been trending upwards over several years.

The excess deaths dropped below the 5 year average whilst they were reporting over a thousand Covid deaths for the same week.

Remember these are 2 weeks old... So two weeks ago the average was what, 85 a day?

The other thing is.. where is the reporting on this? 4 straight weeks where the excess death is below 5 year average. Not a peep anywhere, when they were above it was wall to wall coverage. Why the difference?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top