The 9am figures not disclosed yet?

RandySavage said:
Following on from your Florida reporting I asked you to compile for me Billy it seems there is a massive discrepancy between what the hospitals are reporting and what the state is reporting.

Oh dear.

https://justthenews.com/politics-po...was-inflated-90?amp&__twitter_impression=true

https://www.fox35orlando.com/video/739328

My friend who lives there over in Kissimmee says the locals are in uproar. He himself went for a test the other day out of curiousity and it came back negative.
Click to expand...
I know you struggle more than most with confirmation bias (the tweets you post show this) but you probably need to be more selective of your sources.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/
 
SmallTown said:
I know you struggle more than most with confirmation bias (the tweets you post show this) but you probably need to be more selective of your sources.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/
Click to expand...
Ah so an actual human being that I personally know isn't a source? Oh and Fox news isn't a big enough news corporation for you?

Good one Smalltown. You make me giggle each and every day.

Don't go outside now, there is a world ending virus on the loose, can't you smell the rotting bodies from your balcony?
😶
 
RandySavage said:
Ah so an actual human being that I personally know isn't a source? Oh and Fox news isn't a big enough news corporation for you?

Good one Smalltown. You make me giggle each and every day.

Don't go outside now, there is a world ending virus on the loose, can't you smell the rotting bodies from your balcony?
😶
Click to expand...
Don't over react again. It's unedifying.
 
SmallTown said:
Don't over react again. It's unedifying.
Click to expand...
Over react? Ha ok. I've learnt my lesson. I'll discuss points in the future with folk who understand that there isn't just one narrative to follow. 😉
For those of us under the age of 45, which I understand isn't many on here.

20200715_093740.png

No doubt Billy or Bear will be along soon to dispute this graph because its a different colour or the numbers are to simple. 😉
 
RandySavage said:
Over react? Ha ok. I've learnt my lesson. I'll discuss points in the future with folk who understand that there isn't just one narrative to follow. 😉
For those of us under the age of 45, which I understand isn't many on here.

View attachment 4795

No doubt Billy or Bear will be along soon to dispute this graph because its a different colour or the numbers are to simple. 😉
Click to expand...
I'm under the age of 45. Does that mean I should act all "alright Jack" and not care about people over the age of 45? Such as my family?
 
SmallTown said:
I'm under the age of 45. Does that mean I should act all "alright Jack" and not care about people over the age of 45? Such as my family?
Click to expand...
Do what you want fella.
Some of us don't get off on doom and gloom and like to see some good news. 🥶
 
SmallTown said:
You just seemed to be suggesting that if you are OK, you shouldn't care about others. Same with your aversion to masks.
Click to expand...
I don't have an aversion to masks, if I did I wouldn't be going to work. 😉

But you seem to have a problem with people who don't want to wear them and won't go to shops that force you to do so.

Anyways back to the subject of the thread, figures.

Screenshot_20200715-121910.png
 
Last edited:
RandySavage said:
I don't have an aversion to masks, if I did I wouldn't be going to work. 😉

But you seem to have a problem with people who don't want to wear them and won't go to shops that force you to do so. You also have not commented on how this will be policed?
Click to expand...

To be fair I’ve been thinking about this, if we are asking people to come out of shielding who are the most vulnerable, us wearing a mask will take the risk down of catching it

If that’s you approach though masks should be mandatory everywhere
 
RandySavage said:
I don't have an aversion to masks, if I did I wouldn't be going to work. 😉

But you seem to have a problem with people who don't want to wear them and won't go to shops that force you to do so. You also have not commented on how this will be policed?
Click to expand...
I do have a problem with people that don’t want to wear them. Due to the fact you’re wearing them to protect others, not wearing them is inherently selfish.
 
SmallTown said:
I do have a problem with people that don’t want to wear them. Due to the fact you’re wearing them to protect others, not wearing them is inherently selfish.
Click to expand...
But these same people have said they won't be going to the shops so you actually have a problem with people not going to the shops.
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 538 new cases reported in 24-hour period, up from yesterday's 398
• 7-day average for new cases decreases by 2.2% to 584 per day, following 4.2% decrease yesterday
• 7-day average for new cases is 7.0% higher than one week ago (from 4.0% higher yesterday) and 34.5% lower than two weeks ago (from 31.1% lower yesterday and 49.5% lower 7 days ago)
• 85 new deaths in all settings reported in 24-hour period, down from 138 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths in all settings decreases by 7.1% to 77 per day, following 2.9% decrease yesterday (and 7th decrease in the past 8 days)
• 7-day average for new deaths in all settings is 12.4% lower than one week ago (from 12.8% lower yesterday) and 35.0% lower than two weeks ago (from 28.1% lower yesterday and 25.3% lower 7 days ago)
 
Something strange happening with hospital admissions in Wales.

The population of Wales is 3.1m, which is about 5.5% of the size of England's population. Total hospital admissions in Wales have always been higher than you might expect from a population comparison, with 11,521 in total compared with England's 108,246 (10.6%).

However, in the past 7 days, the number of daily admissions in Wales has totalled 437, whilst England's total has been 739. That means that, over the past week, hospital admissions in Wales have been running at almost 60% of those in England (or to put it another way, more than 10 times the level you might reasonably expect).
 
Billy Horner said:
Something strange happening with hospital admissions in Wales.

The population of Wales is 3.1m, which is about 5.5% of the size of England's population. Total hospital admissions in Wales have always been higher than you might expect from a population comparison, with 11,521 in total compared with England's 108,246 (10.6%).

However, in the past 7 days, the number of daily admissions in Wales has totalled 437, whilst England's total has been 739. That means that, over the past week, hospital admissions in Wales have been running at almost 60% of those in England (or to put it another way, more than 10 times the level you might reasonably expect).
Click to expand...
What could be the explanation, stricter lockdown than England?

Care homes?
 
GazC_MFC said:
What could be the explanation, stricter lockdown than England?

Care homes?
Click to expand...

I don't know to be honest. I doubt it's lockdown related, because I think Wales were/are stricter than England so, if anything, you'd expect them to have much lower figures.

Looking at the number of positive tests for the same period, England had 4,193 cases whilst Wales only had 75. Come to think of it, that means that Wales had almost six times more hospital admissions than they had cases!

Something definitely not right here.
 
Billy Horner said:
I don't know to be honest. I doubt it's lockdown related, because I think Wales were/are stricter than England so, if anything, you'd expect them to have much lower figures.

Looking at the number of positive tests for the same period, England had 4,193 cases whilst Wales only had 75. Come to think of it, that means that Wales had almost six times more hospital admissions than they had cases!

Something definitely not right here.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a correction of data would explain in maybe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top