Yes. Come on Ian “The Moose” Abraham. Tell us!!As I said above there’s normally a reason for these stories.
Btw for all our posts of varying opinions
there’s only one man that truly knows the truth and he’s also the only one that can end the speculation as well.
Link? Not on their Twitter feed. And in any case couldn’t they have just jumped on the Daily Mail murmers?
Er no not himYes. Come on Ian “The Moose” Abraham. Tell us!!
This situation has been abundantly clear since the window shut and from Wilder's team selections. It can't be allowed to go on, Gibson should have acted in this international break and brought Bilic in.
I dont think anybody will be. Disappointment from me yes. Pure pure conjecture on my part but I suspect CW and SG have issues between them. For the reasons speculated.Seems to me that when Wilder was appointed he and Scott shook hands on an agreement to compromise and find common ground but both secretly had their fingers crossed behind there backs and both believed they could get their own way. Now they are just butting heads.
Ultimately Scott is the senior man in this dynamic and there will only be one winner if it carries on. Maybe Wilders many assertions of what a good fit the club was for him was trying to convince himself more than anyone else. I'd like to see him stay and be a success but there is rarely this much smoke without a fire. Won't be surprised to see him go.
Promotion would cover thatCheers for your post and feedback, no way what so ever Karanka ran a transfer surplus. He ran a deficit.
Some Championship buys
Rhodes £9m
Downing £5.3m
Nugent £4m
Kike £3m
Fabbrini £3m
De la Pena £2m
Voessen - loan fee
Clayton £2.5m
Stuani £2m
Where we the fees coming in to cover the above?
Thats just 2 seasons and there were more that I have not listed.
I agree with you but would much sooner Scott leave than Wilder.Seems to me that when Wilder was appointed he and Scott shook hands on an agreement to compromise and find common ground but both secretly had their fingers crossed behind there backs and both believed they could get their own way. Now they are just butting heads.
Ultimately Scott is the senior man in this dynamic and there will only be one winner if it carries on. Maybe Wilders many assertions of what a good fit the club was for him was trying to convince himself more than anyone else. I'd like to see him stay and be a success but there is rarely this much smoke without a fire. Won't be surprised to see him go.
If the strained relationship is with Scott and not SG then I think Scott needs to leave. Whatever is the cause of the issue (if there is one and there probably is) then it needs to be resolved urgently with a departure.I dont think anybody will be. Disappointment from me yes. Pure pure conjecture on my part but I suspect CW and SG have issues between them. For the reasons speculated.
The strained relationship exacerbated by results on the pitch which have permeated down to the players. SG cannot afford to dismiss CW so is anticipating he will leave for another job and perhaps get compensation too.
Pure speculation on my part but that’s how it feels to me.
So what's your overall assessment of it now, Viv? Are you starting to think there's more in this than we may have given credence to initially?Dear god. Dear, dear god.
What does that say to anyone coming into the club in a role above the manager though?If the strained relationship is with Scott and not SG then I think Scott needs to leave. Whatever is the cause of the issue (if there is one and there probably is) then it needs to be resolved urgently with a departure.
It’s very vague but it’s the source that makes me confident he’s leaving. All I was told is it’s likely he will be leaving soon. But the source is very good so guess it’s just a game of wait and seeJust going from what I’ve read this morning, it sounds like Wilder’s team/agents are trying to sound out other employers in an attempt to get Gibson to sack him so he can leave and get a compensation package, rather than resign.
I’d be surprised if he was here for our next home game.
@Diego have you already said what your source is telling you or have I missed that?
Has anything actually changed? Some journalists have said there is uncertainty, one says that a club might want Wilder when a takeover happens further down the line. None of this is revelatory TBH.So what's your overall assessment of it now, Viv? Are you starting to think there's more in this than we may have given credence to initially?