The 9am figures not disclosed yet?

So, reports saying that the error was as a result of using an Excel spreadsheet as a database. Each case per column rather than a row, which runs out at around ~16k.

How much money has been put into this? 😒

That is absolutely ridiculous... Imagine the meeting 'we will just pop it all on a CSV file no worries.' 🤦🏻‍♂️
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 12,594 new cases reported in 24-hour period, down from yesterday's 22,961
• 7-day average for new cases increases by 12.6% to 10,937 per day, following 34.0% increase yesterday (and 42nd increase in the past 45 days)
• 7-day average for new cases is 89.6% higher than one week ago (from 67.0% higher yesterday) and 178.4% higher than two weeks ago (from 164.1% higher yesterday and 92.1% higher 7 days ago)
• 19 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, down from 33 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test increases by 1.7% to 53 per day, following 4.6% increase yesterday (and 21st increase in the past 23 days)
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 72.8% higher than one week ago (from 71.6% higher yesterday) and 143.7% higher than two weeks ago (from 143.0% higher yesterday and 156.6% higher 7 days ago)
 
Whilst I would agree that there doesn't seem to be much evidence of a positive impact as yet, on your broader point it would seem very odd if the areas in local lockdown weren't the ones with the highest case rates.
The north west has been under local lockdown measures for a while now and Manchester still has the highest cases per 100,000 in the country.

Are the lockdowns actually doing anything to combat the virus? Doesn't appear so.
 
The north west has been under local lockdown measures for a while now and Manchester still has the highest cases per 100,000 in the country.

Are the lockdowns actually doing anything to combat the virus? Doesn't appear so.

I've said this since April (and the events of this week continue to show the problem), until we get a comprehensive and fully functioning test, trace and isolate system in place we will be fighting a losing battle against this virus.
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 14,542 new cases reported in 24-hour period, up from yesterday's 12,594
• 7-day average for new cases increases by 9.7% to 11,994 per day, following 12.6% increase yesterday (and 43rd increase in the past 46 days)
• 7-day average for new cases is 97.1% higher than one week ago (from 89.6% higher yesterday) and 178.4% higher than two weeks ago (from 186.3% higher yesterday and 96.6% higher 7 days ago)
• 76 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, up from 19 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test increases by 1.4% to 53 per day, following 1.7% increase yesterday (and 22nd increase in the past 24 days)
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 51.0% higher than one week ago (from 72.8% higher yesterday) and 131.7% higher than two weeks ago (from 143.7% higher yesterday and 216.7% higher 7 days ago)
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 14,162 new cases reported in 24-hour period, down from yesterday's 14,542
• 7-day average for new cases increases by 8.4% to 13,002 per day, following 9.7% increase yesterday (and 44th increase in the past 47 days)
• 7-day average for new cases is 109.0% higher than one week ago (from 97.1% higher yesterday) and 188.8% higher than two weeks ago (from 186.3% higher yesterday and 89.3% higher 7 days ago)
• 70 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, down from 76 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test decreases by 0.3% to 53 per day, following 1.4% increase yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 32.4% higher than one week ago (from 51.0% higher yesterday) and 109.0% higher than two weeks ago (from 131.7% higher yesterday and 212.2% higher 7 days ago)
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 17,540 new cases reported in 24-hour period, up from yesterday's 14,162
• 7-day average for new cases increases by 11.7% to 14,520 per day, following 8.4% increase yesterday (and 45th increase in the past 48 days)
• 7-day average for new cases is 132.0% higher than one week ago (from 109.0% higher yesterday) and 192.5% higher than two weeks ago (from 188.8% higher yesterday and 86.6% higher 7 days ago)
• 77 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, up from 70 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test increases by 4.8% to 56 per day, following 0.3% decrease yesterday (and 21st increase in the past 23 days)
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 30.0% higher than one week ago (from 32.4% higher yesterday) and 98.0% higher than two weeks ago (from 109.0% higher yesterday and 209.3% higher 7 days ago)
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 13,864 new cases reported in 24-hour period, down from yesterday's 17,540
• 7-day average for new cases increases by 6.8% to 15,505 per day, following 11.7% increase yesterday (and 46th increase in the past 49 days)
• 7-day average for new cases is 147.2% higher than one week ago (from 132.0% higher yesterday) and 191.0% higher than two weeks ago (from 192.5% higher yesterday and 81.0% higher 7 days ago)
• 87 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, up from 77 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test increases by 5.4% to 59 per day, following 4.8% increase yesterday (and 22nd increase in the past 24 days)
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 24.2% higher than one week ago (from 30.0% higher yesterday) and 100.5% higher than two weeks ago (from 98.0% higher yesterday and 180.5% higher 7 days ago)
 
Obviously significantly up on last week (although last weeks figure was missing data), but good to see a big day on day drop. It does seem to have ripped through the student population, pretty much every student area on the cases map has huge numbers. With Newcastle stating 1k of their students (4%ish) as well as at least 1300 at Northumbria, I'm wondering once all the students have been back a month or so, will numbers tail off? From all I've seen they aren't social distancing in the slightest, where most other demographics are and hopefully won't be as hard hit.
 
The north west has been under local lockdown measures for a while now and Manchester still has the highest cases per 100,000 in the country.

Are the lockdowns actually doing anything to combat the virus? Doesn't appear so.

So what do you suggest a free for all. Nothing wrong with the idea of local lockdown but the are not stringent enough.
 
Highest number of positive tests (7-day average) as a proportion of all tests processed (7-day average) since 12th May.
Highest 7-day average for hospital admissions since 4th June (probably since slightly before then, as the most recent data available does not include Scotland).
Highest number of people on ventilation since 9th June.
Highest 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test since 1st July.
First instance of four consecutive days with 70 or more new deaths announced since 26th June.
 
So what do you suggest a free for all. Nothing wrong with the idea of local lockdown but the are not stringent enough.
Something isn't working as it should is it? The evidence is all there for people to see. Stringent enough? Should be start welding up people's front doors like they did in Wuhan? Or how about posting armed police officers outside high rise flats like they did in Australia?

Little nugget, if the current number of infections continues for the rest of 2020 that's 1.4 million people with a positive test result.
 
The trend for the above metrics is that for the positive test rate and hospital data, for every additional week we are moving approximately two weeks back up the curve of the first wave. For the deaths data, for every additional week we are moving one week back up the curve.
 
Back
Top