The 9am figures not disclosed yet?

Today's headline analysis:

• 15,144 new cases reported in 24-hour period, up from yesterday's 13,494
• 7-day average for new cases decreases by 3.7% to 14,604 per day, following 6.3% decrease yesterday (and 33rd consecutive daily decrease)
• 7-day average for new cases is 26.3% lower than one week ago (from 28.6% lower yesterday) and 45.9% lower than two weeks ago (from 46.9% lower yesterday and 48.2% lower 7 days ago)
• 758 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, up from 678 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test decreases by 4.8% to 718 per day, following 4.3% decrease yesterday (and 19th decrease in the past 20 days)
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 27.1% lower than one week ago (from 25.9% lower yesterday) and 40.1% lower than two weeks ago (from 38.2% lower yesterday and 20.6% lower 7 days ago)
 
Like you, I have wondered why it is that the SE figures have dropped massively and rapidly from being some of the very worst (over 1000) to now some of the best whilst the rest of the country drops fairly slowly by comparison. Not saying there’s anything conspiratorial in it but it does seem odd. Perhaps one of the stats guys can explain it.....?

Not a stats answer, but looks like we have a possible reason for the trend in Middlesbrough.

 
What’s the context to the data?
Up to 40% of cases in the 'first wave' may have been picked up in hospitals.
Cemented by the fact government repeatedly refused freedom of information requests.

Sets alarm bells ringing off.
 
And perhaps the lack of PPE helped spread the infection in hospitals if staff didn't use once and discard, as they are supposed to do.
 
So that 'patients in hospital with covid statistic' is a misnomer.
It's not a misnomer, the figure is still true, the people were in hospital, and had Covid, and this is effectively supported by the deaths, excess deaths and staff accounts etc.
 
It's not a misnomer, the figure is still true, the people were in hospital, and had Covid, and this is effectively supported by the deaths, excess deaths and staff accounts etc.

No it's a misnomer you don't understand the definition of the word. You're understanding of all things is poor as shown in many other threads. You're free to believe you're correct
 
And perhaps the lack of PPE helped spread the infection in hospitals if staff didn't use once and discard, as they are supposed to do.
The problem was there wasn't enough PPE, if fact on some wards there effectively wasn't any PPE of the level needed, this is widely known and my friends have confirmed the same.

So the options were, wear the same PPE and still give care, or don't have any PPE, get covid, pass covid on, get sick, and there be less care.

To be honest, I don't know where the stats have come from, and don't know how this has been checked or proven, seeing as we didn't have enough testing capacity then either.
 
No it's a misnomer you don't understand the definition of the word. You're understanding of all things is poor as shown in many other threads. You're free to believe you're correct
misnomer
a wrong or inaccurate name or designation.
a wrong or inaccurate use of a name or term.

'patients in hospital with covid statistic' = patients in hospital with covid = the number reported for 'patients in hospital with covid'

I think you might mean what made them form part of that statistic (which would be completely different thing), but it's not like you to be deceptive.....is it
 
The problem was there wasn't enough PPE, if fact on some wards there effectively wasn't any PPE of the level needed, this is widely known and my friends have confirmed the same.

So the options were, wear the same PPE and still give care, or don't have any PPE, get covid, pass covid on, get sick, and there be less care.

To be honest, I don't know where the stats have come from, and don't know how this has been checked or proven, seeing as we didn't have enough testing capacity then either.
My point was, the governments lack of prep possibly caused the reuse of ppe, and directly causing deaths.
 
As of 9am on 13 February, 4,027,106 people have tested positive for COVID-19 in the UK.

Positive cases were 13,308.

621 deaths were reported today

121,674 deaths with Covid-19 on the death certificate (up to 29 January)

14,556,827 have had a first dose vaccination.504,603 first dose vaccinations yesterday.
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 13,308 new cases reported in 24-hour period, down from yesterday's 15,144
• 7-day average for new cases decreases by 4.8% to 13,896 per day, following 3.7% decrease yesterday (and 34th consecutive daily decrease)
• 7-day average for new cases is 27.3% lower than one week ago (from 26.3% lower yesterday) and 45.5% lower than two weeks ago (from 45.9% lower yesterday and 48.6% lower 7 days ago)
• 621 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, down from 758 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test decreases by 4.1% to 688 per day, following 4.8% decrease yesterday (and 20th decrease in the past 21 days)
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 26.1% lower than one week ago (from 27.1% lower yesterday) and 41.6% lower than two weeks ago (from 40.1% lower yesterday and 25.4% lower 7 days ago)
 
As of 9am on 14 February, 4,038,078 people have tested positive for COVID-19 in the UK.

Positive cases were 10,972.

258 deaths were reported today

121,674 deaths with Covid-19 on the death certificate (up to 29 January)

15,062,189 have had a first dose vaccination. 505,362 first dose vaccinations yesterday.
 
Back
Top