Jedi boro
Well-known member
$20,000 and a free trip to ParisIt's a civil case where the evidence threshold does not extend to forensics. There will be no plea or verdict but I'm guessing there may be an out of court settlement.
$20,000 and a free trip to ParisIt's a civil case where the evidence threshold does not extend to forensics. There will be no plea or verdict but I'm guessing there may be an out of court settlement.
I mean how many times was he 'urged' to speak to the FBI about the Epstein affair?He could have put an end to all of this speculation by answering the questions of the FBI, instead of refusing to speak to them. If I was being accused but was innocent, I’d be pretty keen to clear my name.
Regarding the Royals, the likelihood is they know exactly what is going to be uncovered during the civil trial and have moved to distance themselves accordingly.
If he was innocent he'd over there fighting his case.What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
If he's not innocent they should not still call him DukeIf he was innocent he'd over there fighting his case.
Definitely over steps his mark does Charlie but have met him and been around his work for some time in a previous job and he is a really decent blokeNever has a more spineless individual held those titles. Mates in the navy who have met him or been on the same ship say he is a complete bellend. The same people say Charles is a gent and has time for other people
He's got ten thousand men.Why does it keep the Duke Of York title?
And some underage girlsHe's got ten thousand men.
the stupid ones are the people who believe andrew!!!!!!if he had nothing to hide he would have been over there to clear his name,but no,because hes guilty as sinTo put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?
There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
What should he be called. The whole Royal Family thing is so preposterous that nobody knows their real names.The BBC are still referring to him as Prince Andrew or Duke of Yorrt
I assumed it was Windsor or Mountbatten. I just looked it up...What should he be called. The whole Royal Family thing is so preposterous that nobody knows their real names.
Bonnie and Clyde (RIP) and family perhaps?
Again - this isn't a criminal case, it's a civil suit. There can't be a conviction, just a judgement as to damages.To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
Well its a case of who to believe. On balance I would not believe andrew. But this is a very special case and one of the consequences of Dueffre prevailing I think this would turn in to a criminal case.the stupid ones are the people who believe andrew!!!!!!if he had nothing to hide he would have been over there to clear his name,but no,because hes guilty as sin
If I had the choice even if I knew I was innocent I would not attend a US court. Their whole plea bargaining system stinks.the stupid ones are the people who believe andrew!!!!!!if he had nothing to hide he would have been over there to clear his name,but no,because hes guilty as sin
That is very much how it seems.Its almost like they got in a room and she asked him if he did it. He said yes and she handed down the punishment.