Prince Andrew no longer HRH

HundredRoom

Well-known member
To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?

There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
 

Corcaigh_the_Cat

Well-known member
To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?

There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
The witch hunt was carried out by his own family and hangers on. They're the ones who have made the decision to distance themselves from him.
 

zzzzz

Well-known member
To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?

There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
No way would the Palace have stripped him if he was innocent. Not a chance. There is no institution in the Land that is tighter knit. Look how they closed ranks on Lady Di.
They know something and stripping him now is damage limitation.
 

newusername

Well-known member
To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?

There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
He isn't going to be convicted, the court may find for the plaintiff.
Also the case doesn't have to be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt', only 'on the balance of probabilities' .
 

Priv

Well-known member
To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?

There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.

When your defence consists of reading out the lyrics to a shaggy song, not many are going to believe you and have much sympathy.
 

parmoboy

Well-known member
He could have put an end to all of this speculation by answering the questions of the FBI, instead of refusing to speak to them. If I was being accused but was innocent, I’d be pretty keen to clear my name.

Regarding the Royals, the likelihood is they know exactly what is going to be uncovered during the civil trial and have moved to distance themselves accordingly.
 

Trug

Well-known member
Too simplistic. Would you want to have been born a royal? No one would.
No, but if a person is born a royal, there is no compulsion for them to stay a royal.
And I would much prefer my taxes go to support the sick, unemployed, homeless, armed forces, social services, fire services, police, local authorities than to these self serving, scrounging, entitled sycophants.
FFS, no one can even join the armed forces unless they swear loyalty to the queen.
 

wilkos_perm

Well-known member
To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?

There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
Others have named him as present at gatherings with under age girls. I'd have to watch a couple of documentaries again to remind myself who
 

zorro_mfc

Well-known member
No, but if a person is born a royal, there is no compulsion for them to stay a royal.
And I would much prefer my taxes go to support the sick, unemployed, homeless, armed forces, social services, fire services, police, local authorities than to these self serving, scrounging, entitled sycophants.
FFS, no one can even join the armed forces unless they swear loyalty to the queen.
Look at Zara Phillips and mike tindal to see that it can be done
 

BoroFur

Well-known member
To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?

There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
It's a civil case where the evidence threshold does not extend to forensics. There will be no plea or verdict but I'm guessing there may be an out of court settlement.
 
Top
X