Marvanelli
Well-known member
There you go again, refusing to answer the questions raised. Just dodging them like you always do because you don't like the answers.
And as for comparing their league positions....at least put some perspective in place. Warnock took over when we were in the bottom 6.....Pulis took over when we were 7th? 8th?
And Pulis inherited a much better squad than Warnock did.
But that doesn't help your argument does it? So yeah, best leave that bit out shall we??
As for Pulis and Warnock it's simple, very, very simple.
One has created a huge buzz around the place, got all players, fans, everyone pulling in the same direction...which given the circumstances, won't have been easy.
The other just moaned all the time at the lack of width (when he had £25m transfer kitty and had wingers at his disposal) and criticised his own players, amongst other things. Which in turn, led to a horrible toxic environment around the whole place.
Warnock has done more in 1 transfer window, with less funds available, than Pulis did in nearly 2 years. Warnock has identified exactly what we needed, whereas Pulis was happy ******* up the transfer funds on signing a million CMs.
It's amazing the measures you'll go to, to defend your hero. When in simple terms. He failed. He categorically failed in his objectives.
He was brought here because Gibson thought he was a sure thing for promotion. And having 2 cracks at the whip and a large amount of money to spend, he failed. All whilst playing the worst branded football we've seen in a long long time, which is funny because Aitor was lambasted on here by yourself for playing awful football....yet in turn, Aitor got results unlike that idiot.
Warnock's man management, his tactics, set up, mannerism is far greater and better than Pulis in every department.
One day, you will see that Pulis failed and set us back years with his 50 central midfield signings and only now are we starting to recover from the mess he left us in....actually, you may not realise.
Answer one question...I dare you...
Was Pulis a success or a failure?
Answer on a postcard please.
And as for comparing their league positions....at least put some perspective in place. Warnock took over when we were in the bottom 6.....Pulis took over when we were 7th? 8th?
And Pulis inherited a much better squad than Warnock did.
But that doesn't help your argument does it? So yeah, best leave that bit out shall we??
As for Pulis and Warnock it's simple, very, very simple.
One has created a huge buzz around the place, got all players, fans, everyone pulling in the same direction...which given the circumstances, won't have been easy.
The other just moaned all the time at the lack of width (when he had £25m transfer kitty and had wingers at his disposal) and criticised his own players, amongst other things. Which in turn, led to a horrible toxic environment around the whole place.
Warnock has done more in 1 transfer window, with less funds available, than Pulis did in nearly 2 years. Warnock has identified exactly what we needed, whereas Pulis was happy ******* up the transfer funds on signing a million CMs.
It's amazing the measures you'll go to, to defend your hero. When in simple terms. He failed. He categorically failed in his objectives.
He was brought here because Gibson thought he was a sure thing for promotion. And having 2 cracks at the whip and a large amount of money to spend, he failed. All whilst playing the worst branded football we've seen in a long long time, which is funny because Aitor was lambasted on here by yourself for playing awful football....yet in turn, Aitor got results unlike that idiot.
Warnock's man management, his tactics, set up, mannerism is far greater and better than Pulis in every department.
One day, you will see that Pulis failed and set us back years with his 50 central midfield signings and only now are we starting to recover from the mess he left us in....actually, you may not realise.
Answer one question...I dare you...
Was Pulis a success or a failure?
Answer on a postcard please.
