boroboy6872
Well-known member
Oh!Nope
(thumbs up emoji)
Oh!Nope
Well that’s simple - don’t do it then - nobody’s making you - it’s a choice you makebuy a season ticket every year. I do a 4 hour round journey every week to watch them at home. I go to most away games too. Easily spending thousands a year to follow the team. “Get behind the club” is an insult to all those fans who go to any amount of games.
How do you know it’s the majority - it might be from an unrepresentative few members on one specific message board, but that’s irrelevant.Sorry. - Wasn't meant like that, I meant the majority, wouldn't speak for anyone.
Well it feels that way, every poll I've seen on various platforms tells me that is very much the feeling and word of mouth also. Everyone I speak too is saying the same thing.How do you know it’s the majority - it might be from a statistically irrelevant and unrepresentative few members on one specific message board, but that’s irrelevant.
I’m not quite sure what point you’re trying to make. My response was to someone insinuating that you’re not backing the team unless you’re Carrick in. My argument is that you can absolutely be behind the team and the club (e.g by going to games) but also want a new manager. In fact, I’d argue wanting better standards for your club is getting behind the club.Well that’s simple - don’t do it then - nobody’s making you - it’s a choice you make
Excellent postI’m not quite sure what point you’re trying to make. My response was to someone insinuating that you’re not backing the team unless you’re Carrick in. My argument is that you can absolutely be behind the team and the club (e.g by going to games) but also want a new manager. In fact, I’d argue wanting better standards for your club is getting behind the club.
I’m reading your response as suggesting we should all stop going to the football and cease having an opinion on it. Hopefully that’s not what you mean otherwise we may as well just shut this forum down entirely!
I’m not complaining about paying to go to games, I just don’t like when it’s suggested you’re not a proper fan unless you’re ‘Carrick in’.
It’s entirely his fault that we lacked organisation, aggression and leadership. With the backing he has had, we should not be a midtable Championship team. Not sure a review is needed to tell us that.Carrick won't be sacked. He lost his best 2 players mid-season and it wasn't his fault. He should be given an apology. And you go to admire the character and stoicism of the guy. And he's still young.
Fans are never patient. I’m amazed Steve Gibson has remained so this time not that that is a bad thing. I hope the trust he places in MC, should we keep him, is repaid. It’s a ballsy move but possibly worth the gamble.I renewed my season ticket and will go into the new season hoping that Carrick can win back the majority of the fanbase. It's not going to be easy though. I could see it turning toxic if we lose our first home game.
We got off to a decent start in the Championship under Southgate following relegation but it didn't take fans long to turn when we had a couple of bad results, because I think there was still a lot of bad feeling there from the previous season. I fear it would be a similar case with Carrick.
I think he will have to get off to a near enough perfect start, and even if he manages it, as soon as we go on a bad run are fans going to be patient?
I am amazed other supporters are willing to be blind sided by a man who has a chronic history of dithering with managers who are obviously unsuitable, before having to jerk into action when their failure continues. He wastes so much time.Fans are never patient. I’m amazed Steve Gibson has remained so this time not that that is a bad thing. I hope the trust he places in MC, should we keep him, is repaid. It’s a ballsy move but possibly worth the gamble.
And then appointing Monk who hadn't done anything of note in the game and handing over a huge war chest to him and his agent...totally destroying any chance we had of getting back up.I am amazed other supporters are willing to be blind sided by a man who has a chronic history of dithering with managers who are obviously unsuitable, before having to jerk into action when their failure continues. He wastes so much time.
The excuses circulating beggar belief.
When you cling on to the fact you really like someone, really want them to succeed and feel they act with integrity, yet all the evidence points to their inadequacy or unsuitability, then you are making poor decisions.
Getting Venables in was the classic example of being prepared to do anything to prop up a flailing Bryan Robson. Gambling with the club to protect a buddy.
Retaining Southgate during the limp to relegation and then again through that summer is another, though suspect this was more about a guilty conscience over appointing him and not resourcing him in 2008-09.
Appointing Steve Agnew and Jonathan Woodgate are other examples of Gibson prioritising his personal feeling over competence. Hunches.
Retaining pulis after the playoff no show was another with “Uncle Tony”.
I am not saying integrity and relationship don’t matter, just that they should not paper over competence shortfalls.
The Club must come before the Head Coach.
So Cardiff, I don’t see it as a “ballsy move” at all. I see it as really poor judgement again.
I fully agree with your point re Monk being poor judgement, but it’s not one blurred by the cosy relationship factor Gibson gets trapped in.And then appointing Monk who hadn't done anything of note in the game and handing over a huge war chest to him and his agent...totally destroying any chance we had of getting back up.
That's just you making up "facts" to support your view of what is happeningthe cosy relationship factor Gibson gets trapped in
An alternative interpretation is that Gibson gives his managers/coaches every chance to succeed, thus making us more attractive to applicants. Compared to say Watford where if you last to Christmas you'll get a long service award. That he sticks to his appointments can be a good thing. And if he has decided to stick with MC (no one knows yet) let's hope it proves to be a good call.I am amazed other supporters are willing to be blind sided by a man who has a chronic history of dithering with managers who are obviously unsuitable
Has to be a point where you can see the club is holding onto a manager too long though?That's just you making up "facts" to support your view of what is happening
An alternative interpretation is that Gibson gives his managers/coaches every chance to succeed, thus making us more attractive to applicants. Compared to say Watford where if you last to Christmas you'll get a long service award. That he sticks to his appointments can be a good thing. And if he has decided to stick with MC (no one knows yet) let's hope it proves to be a good call.