His defending seems to be the accusation but no one can give an example.Rotherham have conceded considerably fewer goals with him there than our miserable defence over the same period.
I've not watched him/ them enough to comment on that, to be honest, or not paid as much attention, but there are a hundred other variables that are all interlinked, I've only considered some of the basic ones, some have only considered that he scores some long rangers (and that's it).
Some other things to factor:
They've had a lot more to play for recently than we have (ultimately they failed)
We've had a lot of injuries, and a large chunk of our team knows they're leaving (and are playing like it)
We finished higher this year, with Wing out of the team (albeit different team/ manager)
How often does Wing gain/ lose possession?
What does he create/ what does he cost?
What impact does his positional play have for the positive, what is the negative?
What's their alternative?
What's our alternative?
Where are Rotherham aiming to be?
Where are we aiming to be?
Is Wing good enough for us? Is he good enough for a play-off team? Is he good enough for a top 2 team?
Have we seen wing in training, compared to the rest of our team, 3 times a week for a year or two?
Do we analyse in the same depth as the analysts/ coaches?
There's a lot that goes into it. Personally, I think he's a great striker of the ball and a good enough centre mid for a lower/ mid-table side, but I think we need to aim higher.
It's unfortunate for him though, had he got into a good coaching system earlier, it would have made him 10 times better, by now, and he will get better and better until he's 30 or so, as his lacking elements can still be coached I think. Whereas some of our midfielders around the same age, and younger lads may have already peaked.