Konrad_the_Barbarian
Well-known member
I don't see the point in dragging this back up. The post was a response to that performance against Scotland.
Facts:
1. The performance against Scotland was totally $hit and unacceptable from a team with so much attacking talent. Not one shot on target
2. Kane and Sterling (amongst others) were very poor in that game. In fact Kane's overall game has been poor up until the goal against Germany.
3. England results have improved. They had to. Hanging on to a 0-0 against a team ranked 40 places below England is like Boro hanging on for a 0-0 against Hartlepool.
Are people really trying to excuse that performance as if it was somehow part of a greater master plan that they could see ?
Facts:
1. The performance against Scotland was totally $hit and unacceptable from a team with so much attacking talent. Not one shot on target
2. Kane and Sterling (amongst others) were very poor in that game. In fact Kane's overall game has been poor up until the goal against Germany.
3. England results have improved. They had to. Hanging on to a 0-0 against a team ranked 40 places below England is like Boro hanging on for a 0-0 against Hartlepool.
Are people really trying to excuse that performance as if it was somehow part of a greater master plan that they could see ?