Just thinking about this now. He epitomises why I’ve always been against signing ‘squad players’. Any club should be careful with its money and only really be buying someone if they’re better than what you already have. If they’re not then what’s the point. A coach and his staff should always aim to replace the weakest player in the team, one by one. By strengthening the first eleven you strengthen the squad in the process.
You might loan in some quality you can’t afford, you may loan in someone to cover for a bit, but you don’t buy players as cover. That’s what your youth set-up is for.
I mean, look at this list I’m going to post here off the top of my head:
Mendez-Laing, Burgzorg, Barlaser, Engel, Hoppe, Fisher, Siliki, Iheanacho, Thomas, Greenwood, Silvera, Ikpeazu, Edmundson. There will be more I’m sure. All signed in the last three years as back up or cover but not one of them good enough to be a starter, each and every one of them taking up sh*tloads of cash in fees, loan fees and wages.
There’s constant talk of ‘the model’ but we don’t really appear to be doing that, or at least not doing it *that* well - not as well as it’s been done by others, who did it first and potentially cornered a lot of the markets we will be looking at. You need to be signing players to go into the team. If there’s joined up thinking then your recruitment team have identified replacements right across the board and been buying them in and getting them out on loan, ready for the time when the senior player in their position is about to be sold on for big money. This is what the clubs we appear to be imitating have done but it’s not what we are doing.
Clubs that are serious about winning promotion are not signing Burgzorg, or Silvera, or George Edmundson or any of the other League One players on that list above.
We need better than Burgzorg. Much, much better, and we need it ASAP. More players like him joining this summer and it’s another season of second-tier football for us in 26/27.