Glover_elbow
Well-known member
You can never write the b***ds off.FFS. Somehow has ended up being Australia's session.
You can never write the b***ds off.FFS. Somehow has ended up being Australia's session.
I'd say it was a tie. England still marginal favourites to win at 6/5, which is about the same price as we started.FFS. Somehow has ended up being Australia's session.
I would say the draw looks less likely than it did at 11I'd say it was a tie. England still marginal favourites to win at 6/5, which is about the same price as we started.
Was that price before or after we won the toss.I'd say it was a tie. England still marginal favourites to win at 6/5, which is about the same price as we started.
After we won the tossWas that price before or after we won the toss.
I think Australia will be over the moon with 3 wickets and two relatively new batsmen at the crease. Even with 120 runs up
I don’t think anyone was saying the game was massively in anyone favour just that the Aussies edged the session with 3 wicketsCrawley getting out just before lunch wasn't ideal, but I doubt anyone was relying on him going big today. It was always the case that at least 2 out of Pope, Root, Brooks, Stokes and Bairstow would have to make big contributions if we are to post 450+ and 4 out of the 5 can still do that.
I still maintain that the game is currently evenly poised, but this is a big session that will go a long way to deciding this game.
Yeah exactly. I was pretty happy at 2 wickets down with Crawley sat on 60ish and scoring freely. But that wicket in the last over before lunch swung things in their favour.I don’t think anyone was saying the game was massively in anyone favour just that the Aussies edged the session with 3 wickets