ThePrisoner
Well-known member
Meanwhile, at the Gazette:
Why?Loses a bit of credibility when he can't even get the area for which he is PCC right.
It's like saying he's the PCC for my back garden, technically he's correct, but he's actually the PCC for Cleveland.Why?
It's like saying he's the PCC for my back garden, technically he's correct, but he's actually the PCC for Cleveland.
Yes, maybe, either way the whole thing doesn't look good at all.Think it was to highlight the fact he was running for a council seat in Redcar.
Yes but what does that undermine his point?It's like saying he's the PCC for my back garden, technically he's correct, but he's actually the PCC for Cleveland.
Any jobs 'created' so far are all being paid for, directly or indirectly, with public funds, n'est pas? Including the airport.
You nailed itIt’s looking like Ben Houchen got a heads up of a committee decision to investigate involving the NAO so he rushed a letter out before it was announced
I think it does, simple inaccuracies like that tend to leave me less confident of piece in general.Yes but what does that undermine his point?
And today the Gazette is still spinning the story from Houtchen's point of view.
Jen Williams of ft presented is slightly different saying the Nao said they need their remit changingApparently, it is outside of the National Audit Office remit.
NAO says full Teesworks investigation outside of remit
'The NAO is discussing these matters with the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and the appointed auditor for Tees Valley Combined Authority'www.gazettelive.co.uk
Ok so we can see where this is going. Houtchen will try to get an audit carried out by an accountancy firm that will be in his pay.Apparently, it is outside of the National Audit Office remit.
NAO says full Teesworks investigation outside of remit
'The NAO is discussing these matters with the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and the appointed auditor for Tees Valley Combined Authority'www.gazettelive.co.uk