Proof of vaccine to enter nightclubs from September...

exactly, and that's my point the balance being open them but enforce vaccination to protect everyone that goes and everyone that comes into contact with the nightclubbers in the subsequent days. That is the balance, that is required. Football stadia are outdoors which is inherently a less dangerous environment
So why are nightclubs open now? Apparently they are safe until the 19th but after that not so much.

Look we all have a level of restriction we are willing to live with, some more than others.

It is odd that we all want the bar set at exactly what we are comfortable with, any lower and people die, and higher, and well that effects me so no thanks.

The truth is BM that is where we are at.
 
For what it's worth...

The government seem to be pursuing a pretty aggressive tactic of herd immunity over the summer months (and potentially beyond?)

My guess on the 19th date is two-fold: need lead time to work out how this will actually be administered in practice and secondly, the list is likely to be longer than just nightclubs but is not yet agreed/confirmed, this date gives 4-6 weeks for it to be nailed down.
 
Anyone who doesn’t want the vaccine and thinks you’ll be safe in the local pub or club with your mates should read this and get an appointment booked immediately.


It can be too late to change your mind
Have you read the article you posted? It says he had no spleen and no immune system, so would be classed in the highly vulnerable category. It is very different from a fit and healthy 25 year old deciding they don't want to take a jab.
 
Have you read the article you posted? It says he had no spleen and no immune system, so would be classed in the highly vulnerable category. It is very different from a fit and healthy 25 year old deciding they don't want to take a jab.
Yes I read it, however there are also plenty of people walking around with issues as yet undetected, people may well have compromised immune systems, organ issues and don’t necessarily always know it, some cancers can be slow growing for one, it is an inconvenient truth unfortunately.
 
Why won't a negative test result be enough?
because a) LFTs are notoriously unreliable often giving false positives. b) there is a gap between the test and entering the establishment where you could catch it, and c) if someone without the vax catches it they are more contagious than those with the vax, so should they catch at the event they are more likely to spread it in the days after the event. I'm sure there are more reasons but off the top of my head those 3 are a start.
 
So why are nightclubs open now? Apparently they are safe until the 19th but after that not so much.
You'll have to ask this irresponsible government that
It is odd that we all want the bar set at exactly what we are comfortable with, any lower and people die, and higher, and well that effects me so no thanks.
I don't think it's really fair to say that everyones concerns are about the, personally, some of us have empathy and compassion for others. Boris Johnsons they've all over 80 any so f(*)k 'em attitude appalls me.
 
Yes I read it, however there are also plenty of people walking around with issues as yet undetected, people may well have compromised immune systems, organ issues and don’t necessarily always know it, some cancers can be slow growing for one, it is an inconvenient truth unfortunatel
So what you're saying is you didn't read it before posting and now you're changing your story to make it sound like you did. Nice one.
 
I can't believe anyone on here agrees with making it mandatory for people to be injected with something against their own will, on the threat of not being able to do hardly anything in society otherwise. Honestly baffles me. None of you would have agreed with this 16 months ago.
 
because a) LFTs are notoriously unreliable often giving false positives. b) there is a gap between the test and entering the establishment where you could catch it, and c) if someone without the vax catches it they are more contagious than those with the vax, so should they catch at the event they are more likely to spread it in the days after the event. I'm sure there are more reasons but off the top of my head those 3 are a start.
So if the LFT's are so unreliable why do I now have to take one every day before going to work the same as my missus does?
 
So if the LFT's are so unreliable why do I now have to take one every day before going to work the same as my missus does?
Because they're the best we've got at short notice, but they're still unreliable.
I can't believe anyone on here agrees with making it mandatory for people to be injected with something against their own will
They're not, there are just restrictions on how they interact with everyone else, to protect people from teh stupidity of these people.
None of you would have agreed with this 16 months ago.
Don't know if you noticed, but there has been a deadly pandemic
 
I can't believe anyone on here agrees with making it mandatory for people to be injected with something against their own will, on the threat of not being able to do hardly anything in society otherwise. Honestly baffles me. None of you would have agreed with this 16 months ago.
It is not mandatory and a hell of a lot has changed in 16 months.
 
You'll have to ask this irresponsible government that

I don't think it's really fair to say that everyones concerns are about the, personally, some of us have empathy and compassion for others. Boris Johnsons they've all over 80 any so f(*)k 'em attitude appalls me.
There is a suggestion there that I don't care about people?

It's a dumb idea and doesn't go far enough if you want to go down that route it should apply to everything. Clubs, pubs, transport. In fact to save lives nothing should be open that isn't essential to life. We are all selfish to one extent or another.

In any event there is a fairly raucous outcry against the idea because its an awful idea and if it effected you bm or anyone else on here crying it's a good idea you would be calling it what it is. A divisive idiotic idea.

Because it doesn't effect you you are for it. I imagine you use the odd restaurant or bar. You shouldn't it can kill people.
 
There is a suggestion there that I don't care about people?
I think you are reading too much into, or not enough, I just know that opening up internal events with zero control will kill people for little return. I'm not comfortable with that.

It's a dumb idea and doesn't go far enough if you want to go down that route it should apply to everything.
I've used the word pragmatism and will continue to.

We are all selfish to one extent or another.
Agreed, some are more selfish than others, thats true

In any event there is a fairly raucous outcry against the idea
You are hearing what you want to hear, because there is equally raucous outcry at opening up without controls in place as numbers sky rocket yet again and the NHS prepares to struggle to meet demand yet again. The nation is divided on this, those who see economics, or fun as being more important than old peoples lives, and vice versa. Now if it's 52% or 48% or whatever, populism doesn't make good decisions.

Because it doesn't effect you you are for it.
Don't be silly, every decision effects me, as it also effects you.
I imagine you use the odd restaurant or bar. You shouldn't it can kill people.
I eat outside, I drink outside, that's my compromise to have some element of normality while mitigating risk to me and anyone I come in to contact with. Pragmatism.
 
I think you are reading too much into, or not enough, I just know that opening up internal events with zero control will kill people for little return. I'm not comfortable with that.


I've used the word pragmatism and will continue to.


Agreed, some are more selfish than others, thats true


You are hearing what you want to hear, because there is equally raucous outcry at opening up without controls in place as numbers sky rocket yet again and the NHS prepares to struggle to meet demand yet again. The nation is divided on this, those who see economics, or fun as being more important than old peoples lives, and vice versa. Now if it's 52% or 48% or whatever, populism doesn't make good decisions.


Don't be silly, every decision effects me, as it also effects you.

I eat outside, I drink outside, that's my compromise to have some element of normality while mitigating risk to me and anyone I come in to contact with. Pragmatism.
Your pragmatism is fine until the winter comes. Let's look at this another way.

Do you do daily tests? Do you at least test yourself before you go out?

A simple measure that will save lives but one that very few people do. They don't do it because it's a faff.

The outcry is a bit silly in here about this. We could all do much more but we don't.

Someone who contributes to society should be free to take a full part in that society and have the freedom of choice to be vaccinated or not.

Whilst I think everyone should get vaccinated to bring in legislation that punishes that choice is wrong.

Before you counter with the free to kill people, ask yourself if you do everything you can. The answer is you don't. You do what you are comfortable with or what you can be bothered with. It's human nature
 
Your pragmatism is fine until the winter comes. Let's look at this another way.

Do you do daily tests? Do you at least test yourself before you go out?
Why would I need to? If I'm meeting people yes, if not I don't go indoors with anyone.
The outcry is a bit silly in here about this. We could all do much more but we don't.
Perfect is the enemy of good. We all have to do what we can, and the government have to do a hell of a lot more to make up for people that think it's all a faff to keep fellow citizens alive
Someone who contributes to society should be free to take a full part in that society and have the freedom of choice to be vaccinated or not.
Or to put your words another way, someone who contributes financially to society should be free to kill other citizens, harm society by making people worried to go out, and only give a crap about having a good time themselves and damn the consequences. Being socially aware isn't a one time thing, it's a lifetime commitment.

Whilst I think everyone should get vaccinated to bring in legislation that punishes that choice is wrong.
why? because the alternative is to punish every citizen that does play the game because of largely stupidity and selfishness of a minority. If these covidiots actually wanted their freedom they could go a long way to ensuring it by having the vaccine.

Before you counter with the free to kill people, ask yourself if you do everything you can
Yes, I do, I have been diligent to the extreme. I haven't been in any friends houses, I haven't had anyone but my family in my house or car. I've met a couple of times at pubs, outdoor, socially distanced. Other than be a hermit there isn't much more I can do, now turn that same question on the covidiots...
 
Why would I need to? If I'm meeting people yes, if not I don't go indoors with anyone.

Perfect is the enemy of good. We all have to do what we can, and the government have to do a hell of a lot more to make up for people that think it's all a faff to keep fellow citizens alive

Or to put your words another way, someone who contributes financially to society should be free to kill other citizens, harm society by making people worried to go out, and only give a crap about having a good time themselves and damn the consequences. Being socially aware isn't a one time thing, it's a lifetime commitment.


why? because the alternative is to punish every citizen that does play the game because of largely stupidity and selfishness of a minority. If these covidiots actually wanted their freedom they could go a long way to ensuring it by having the vaccine.


Yes, I do, I have been diligent to the extreme. I haven't been in any friends houses, I haven't had anyone but my family in my house or car. I've met a couple of times at pubs, outdoor, socially distanced. Other than be a hermit there isn't much more I can do, now turn that same question on the covidiots...
You are just demonstrating my argument for me. You do as much as you are comfortable with and no more. You failing to test yourself before you go out means that you are happy to kill people.

To be clear I use that only because you keep using it. Until you do everything you can that argument is facile and ignores the simple fact that you can't throw that insult at people while you are doing the same.

This is going round in circles, you think it's a good idea I think it's a terrible idea, let's leave it there.
 
So what you're saying is you didn't read it before posting and now you're changing your story to make it sound like you did. Nice one.
No that is what you are saying, quite wrongly but such is life and doing it i suspect to suit whatever agenda you have…. Nice One!

The story is sad and self explanatory, my post afterwards was a mere expansion as you clearly did not get it, only you know why you want to create a smokescreen on my reason for posting. I think most people understand the dangers and just because you don’t have a diagnosis, does not mean you are fit and well. We all assume we are at times, but eventually something starts to hit the fan, hence why people need to understand covid is a hidden killer, unfortunately some people seem to think it only happens to others, it doesn’t. We all make bad choices, sometimes they can kill you. This can kill you or use you as a vector to kill others through your complacency… Nice one!
 
Back
Top