Malaguena
Well-known member
Jesus - talk about sweeping (and false) generalisationsThis age bracket has on average more disposable income than any other.
Jesus - talk about sweeping (and false) generalisationsThis age bracket has on average more disposable income than any other.
U16s have nothing but disposable income!Jesus - talk about sweeping (and false) generalisations
Forwarding online was disabled for the last game, had to get tickets printed off for friends. Not sure if they have turned it back on.Officially tickets are not transferable but Boro do help make this as easy to do as possible. They are realists and recognise that families and friends etc share tickets.
I have put on the other thread why we went digital and why lots of other clubs did this season.
Basically some of the turnstiles were starting to show their age. The company gave Boro an option to make them digital and so it would be much cheaper to do it now when they needed a system upgrade anyway. Future proofing if you like. That decision was made after about a year of research and working with Man City and other clubs that had already gone digital. By the way I know this now but didn't know it at the time. Anyway, it means the stadium will be much better set up for the next 20 years and it will mean in future that there will be benefits of people not having to print at home or have to wait for the post etc. Also, forwarding online can be potentially a lot easier than waiting on the corner to hand over your season card and then remember to get it back for the next game etc.
Ex Forces?Unless a person is that age or approaching that age, I think almost everyone would be against that idea. This age bracket has on average more disposable income than any other.
The context of this is all about generalisations. How can it not be when it’s been suggested to lower the ticket price for anyone in between the age of 60/62 to 65, purely based on age?Jesus - talk about sweeping (and false) generalisations
it was:Nothing in there about wearing betting logos in schools which I thought had been mentioned?
You don’t need permission not to have a gambling sponsor on shirts that are intended for U18. We’re not supposed to be doing it in the first place!it was:
"Gambling logo on shirts
We can explore adult sizes minus gambling logos but would be permission from sponsors to do so, also the club did stock this previously but there was little to no take up. The club will explore the option for team to wear non branded kit to under 18 events."
Thanks for asking the Priority Points / Video pass question Rob - appreciatedHere are the minutes of the last Forum meeting.
There is a lost of this - I can understand the first time it is brought up, they need to do some work on it. If fans have to keep asking and reminding it is an issue than the club currently shouldm be criticised. Some issues will always be issues though such as ticket prices, for example having an adult £300 season ticket would cut the club revenues.Thanks for asking the Priority Points / Video pass question Rob - appreciated
Not just on my question, but the overall impression I get back from the club on everything brought up at the Forum is ..... we're working on it ...... we'll take that away and look into it ....... we're having an investigation ....... we're waiting for seatgeek ....... but nothing ever seems to come back
Rob - on the agenda was kit stock levels in the retail shop, however I cannot see anything in the minutes to show this was discussed?Quick agenda for this evening's meeting..
Ticketing update
Priority point questions
Lateness of away tickets
GRFZ
Stadium
Safe Standing
Safety in stadium
Park & Ride
Kit Stock levels in retail shop
Foodbank dates
Supporter Group updates
Eye.. how long has the membership thing been going on for tho?There is a lost of this - I can understand the first time it is brought up, they need to do some work on it. If fans have to keep asking and reminding it is an issue than the club currently shouldm be criticised. Some issues will always be issues though such as ticket prices, for example having an adult £300 season ticket would cut the club revenues.
The Club did come up with a membership scheme after it was brought up in the Forum.
They also reduced the pressure to join the Digital Ticket scheme by removing the need to "opt out" to go non-digital. This could have been after some fans (through the forum) said they were anxious about been pushed into technology, they were not currently equiped or able to deal with.
The membership scheme wasn't first brought up by the forum. It's been requested ever since they dropped Boro Pride. To the forum's credit they kept up the pressure on the club to bring it back.There is a lost of this - I can understand the first time it is brought up, they need to do some work on it. If fans have to keep asking and reminding it is an issue than the club currently shouldm be criticised. Some issues will always be issues though such as ticket prices, for example having an adult £300 season ticket would cut the club revenues.
The Club did come up with a membership scheme after it was brought up in the Forum.
They also reduced the pressure to join the Digital Ticket scheme by removing the need to "opt out" to go non-digital. This could have been after some fans (through the forum) said they were anxious about been pushed into technology, they were not currently equiped or able to deal with.
With things like a badge change, you would think the obvious thing would be just to put a vote to the fans wouldn't you. Maybe anyone with 3+ priority points gets a vote.The membership scheme wasn't first brought up by the forum. It's been requested ever since they dropped Boro Pride. To the forum's credit they kept up the pressure on the club to bring it back.
Judging by the minutes it appears the club are willing to broach the subject of the badge and carry out a review which is positive.