Jesus, what just happened in Beirut?

FartingGnome said:
"giving credence to the official story not being the truth" is not conspiracy, even if I was giving credence to anything.
Click to expand...
It's practically the definition of a conspiracy theory, one where you know people (usually government or other official sources) conspire to mislead/lie. I can understand you don't want to be labelled a conspiracy theorists, but there's a simple answer to that, don't tout such theories
 
Analysis in the New York Times supports the view that the explosion was Ammonium Nitrate. The red-brown cloud which can be seen after the main explosion is (they say) typical of burnt Ammonium Nitrate, weapons grade explosives burn "cleaner" because a clean burn is more efficient. In a weapon you want a big bang for the weight so you don't see a dirty burn. Doesn't prove what set it off though.
 
RandySavage said:
Why is it nonsense?
Click to expand...
Why are you so keen to repeat it?

It looks dodgy as fukk. Why is it colourised? It is edited to fukk. The other videos of the explosion cover similar angles yet mysteriously the missile is not seen on any. The fire was burning for nearly 1/4 of an hour which is why so many people were filming it yet not one other angle including many far better quality cameras show the "missile".

The source is enough to ring alarm bells in anyone who has thought about it for more than a nano second, the content is risible.

Some of the stuff you post on here comes from seriously dodgy sources, have a look at yourself in the mirror fella. Don't be anyone's mug.
 
How's that proof of an attack? Why is it in the negative? Why is it edited? File in a circular file. BTW the brown smoke is predominantly Nitrogen Dioxide. It's poisonous and it's what you get when you burn or heat AN.
 
Muttley said:
Why are you so keen to repeat it?

It looks dodgy as fukk. Why is it colourised? It is edited to fukk. The other videos of the explosion cover similar angles yet mysteriously the missile is not seen on any. The fire was burning for nearly 1/4 of an hour which is why so many people were filming it yet not one other angle including many far better quality cameras show the "missile".

The source is enough to ring alarm bells in anyone who has thought about it for more than a nano second, the content is risible.

Some of the stuff you post on here comes from seriously dodgy sources, have a look at yourself in the mirror fella. Don't be anyone's mug.
Click to expand...
Hence why I said the source was questionable. Video makes an interesting debate instead of been thrown out straight away.
The colours of the picture have been inverted that is all.
There's an argument for cracking CGI work from both angles and an argument showing its ordinance such as a bunker buster, sabot shell or "rod of God" (Google it).

Like I said it's an interesting debate to be had about different theories that is all. That is one of the joys of message boards.

😶
 
RandySavage said:
Hence why I said the source was questionable. Video makes an interesting debate instead of been thrown out straight away.
The colours of the picture have been inverted that is all.
There's an argument for cracking CGI work from both angles and an argument showing its ordinance such as a bunker buster, sabot shell or "rod of God" (Google it).

Like I said it's an interesting debate to be had about different theories that is all. That is one of the joys of message boards.

😶
Click to expand...
There is absolutely nothing worth debating in that video, it's clearly bollox posted by a nefarious/lunatic individual
 
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...rnal-interference-in-port-blast-idUSKCN2531F9

A few statements from people living there wondering where the government are. Government also refusing to rule out external causes to the explosion until a full investigation is completed.
America has said an attack hasn't been ruled out, Israel deny any involvement and Turkey has compared the blast to a bombing that killed one of its previous prime minister's but is unsure of cause.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top