JEREMY CORBYN SUSPENDED FROM LABOUR

BoroBen92 said:
Whether they were or weren't, it's the sort of moronic response that typified Corbyn's time in charge.
All had to do was remove the section calling the issues overstated and he'd not be suspended.
Click to expand...

Spot on.
Yes, there were improvement, yes the media had it in for him, but the real story is a party led by him has been banged to rights for anti semitism
Take the medicine
 
Terrible decision by Labour.
The EHRC has failed to find the party 'institutionally anti-Semitic.
They Found only two unlawful acts.
They didn't find any individual culpable.
They had to throw out all the accusations against Chris Williamson.
The EHRC " identified serious failings in leadership and an inadequate process for handling anti-Semitism complaints across the Labour Party,” but let's not forget that the failures were not Corbyn's but those named in the Labour leaks who did nothing for months on end to deal with the problem and were actively working against him.

JC has nothing to apologise for.
 
BlindBoyGrunt said:
Terrible decision by Labour.
The EHRC has failed to find the party 'institutionally anti-Semitic.
They Found only two unlawful acts.
They didn't find any individual culpable.
They had to throw out all the accusations against Chris Williamson.
The EHRC " identified serious failings in leadership and an inadequate process for handling anti-Semitism complaints across the Labour Party,” but let's not forget that the failures were not Corbyn's but those named in the Labour leaks who did nothing for months on end to deal with the problem and were actively working against him.

JC has nothing to apologise for.
Click to expand...

Just added to the list. Starting with putting Boris and the Tories in power.
 
BlindBoyGrunt said:
They Found only two unlawful acts.
They didn't find any individual culpable.
They had to throw out all the accusations against Chris Williamson.
The EHRC " identified serious failings in leadership
Click to expand...

Surely 1 is more than enough not "only 2"
Surely the leader of the party is ultimately culpable for any serious failings.
 
Chris_Boro said:
He isn't helping himself now unfortunately.
Click to expand...

I agree he doesn’t help himself at times, but the cat was out the bag when the media and certain Jewish leaders attacked Corbyn for not meeting with Jewish groups, and then attacked him for meeting up with Jewish groups who they didn’t align with.

Anti-Semitism sadly exists in every area of society and it must be eradicated along with racism.

Though like racism, there a bad faith actors who magnifying it and weaponise it against individuals and groups. For some reason, anti-semitism is being weaponised against the left not just in this country but in the US.

Presumably the reason is because people on the left like Jeremy Corbyn, criticise the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians.

They accused Bernie Sanders of being an Anti-Semite for speaking up for the Palestinians, which is preposterous as the man is Jewish.

AOC has publicly criticised the Israeli government, what’s the latest attacks on her from the right? You guessed it, she’s anti-semitic.

All those Labour MPs who publicly called Corbyn an Anti-Semite and said vote Tory, where are they now? They all got peerages as reward for a job well done.

That’s how the system works.
 
Last edited:
BlindBoyGrunt said:
Terrible decision by Labour.
The EHRC has failed to find the party 'institutionally anti-Semitic.
They Found only two unlawful acts.
They didn't find any individual culpable.
They had to throw out all the accusations against Chris Williamson.
The EHRC " identified serious failings in leadership and an inadequate process for handling anti-Semitism complaints across the Labour Party,” but let's not forget that the failures were not Corbyn's but those named in the Labour leaks who did nothing for months on end to deal with the problem and were actively working against him.

JC has nothing to apologise for.
Click to expand...

The EHRC report found Labour responsible for unlawful acts of harassment and discrimination over anti Semitism. It cites 'serious failings in the Labour Party leadership in addressing anti Semitism and an inadequate process for handling anti Semitism complaints.

In any organisation 'the leader' presiding over that has to take accountability/
 
BlindBoyGrunt said:
Terrible decision by Labour.
The EHRC has failed to find the party 'institutionally anti-Semitic.
They Found only two unlawful acts.
They didn't find any individual culpable.
They had to throw out all the accusations against Chris Williamson.
The EHRC " identified serious failings in leadership and an inadequate process for handling anti-Semitism complaints across the Labour Party,” but let's not forget that the failures were not Corbyn's but those named in the Labour leaks who did nothing for months on end to deal with the problem and were actively working against him.

JC has nothing to apologise for.
Click to expand...

I supported Jeremy Corbyn all the way, however to suggest that he has nothing to apologise for over the antisemitism under his leadership is a stretch to far.
 
Same_as_before said:
It's 4 years to the next election, Starmer is building a reputation . Corbyn is a yesterday's man.b
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm sure the political calculation is get this done and out of the way, however messy it is, while there are much bigger issues facing the sitting government and draw a full line under it.

Who was the poster on this board who worked a lot with Corbyn in an official capacity? Wasn't his position that Corbyn basically let the fringe lunatics take over the controls of the train and wasn't capable of stopping it?
 
1finny said:
But I won't call you delusional
Click to expand...

? You make it sound like I've said something terribly hurtful there?

The facts are what they are. The Labour party's finances were in the sh*tter before Corbyn was voted in. Starmer's spent his 6 months as leader telling the membership and the unions to p*ss off. That's the party's funding. Elections are expensive. 2024 is already lost so you're talking about dwindling funds for 9 years that somehow leads to a victory a decade from now.

I say again, it's delusional to think that somehow, a pauper centrist Labour party in 2029 manages to scratch together enough English and Welsh seats to form a government, and everyone turns around and says wow thank goodness Corbyn got the boot in October 2020 that really set us up.
 
BlindBoyGrunt said:
In a party of over half a million?
Click to expand...

Well yes, the leader of any organisation ultimately carries the can. A series of failings in leadership surely the back stops with the leader/manager/CEO etc

It seems to with anything else
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top