Juninhoburger
Well-known member
Odd things going on in the comment section on HouchenLive's app...
Houchen loses in court
- Thread starter JackG
- Start date
mercury_redstone7
Well-known member
Flabbergasted at that, I have met him twice and he was a bit odd/full of hell at the time, I admired his gall, he was in the wrong place with the wrong type of people to be kicking off with. But I never thought he would go on like that with other companies or major players. You get more with sugar than vinegar.
ThePrisoner
Well-known member
Imagine if BenT had got his hands on PD Ports 
dorivasmiddlefinger
Well-known member
Gibson sound like a right c9nt. F**k him 
Juninhoburger
Well-known member
PD Ports were the defendants, and they won.
LessoftheLip
Well-known member
Statement from PD Ports.
www.pdports.co.uk
JUDGMENT HAS FOUND IN FAVOUR OF PD PORTS HAVING RIGHTS OF ACCESS IN LEGAL DISPUTE WITH SOUTH TEES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND TEESWORKS. - PD Ports
A judgment has been handed down today, 5th February 2024, by Mr Justice Rajah, in the legal case commenced by the South Tees Development Corporation against PD Ports contending that PD Teesport had no rights of access across the Corporation’s land. STDC’s stance was supported by Teesworks...
www.pdports.co.uk
Nero
Well-known member
Good response from PD Ports.Statement from PD Ports.
JUDGMENT HAS FOUND IN FAVOUR OF PD PORTS HAVING RIGHTS OF ACCESS IN LEGAL DISPUTE WITH SOUTH TEES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND TEESWORKS. - PD Ports
A judgment has been handed down today, 5th February 2024, by Mr Justice Rajah, in the legal case commenced by the South Tees Development Corporation against PD Ports contending that PD Teesport had no rights of access across the Corporation’s land. STDC’s stance was supported by Teesworks...
Teesside Crab Killer
Well-known member
Predictably #BentBen, his wingman #SimonClart and the STDC are spinning this furiously. The STDC statement is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the truth, saying that they didn't want to go to court, but PD Ports forced their hand. In reality Houchen's arrogance and hubris prevented an out-of-court settlement, and it's cost us £5m. Typical Tory, he doesn't care, it's not his money. He gambled on a big win as part of his re-election campaign, followed by a Bob-the-Builder construction cosplay photo op at South Bank Quay. Eat 
you loser.
North East Bylines doing a far better job than the Gazette, as usual https://northeastbylines.co.uk/judg...ess-in-legal-dispute-with-stdc-and-teesworks/
you loser.North East Bylines doing a far better job than the Gazette, as usual https://northeastbylines.co.uk/judg...ess-in-legal-dispute-with-stdc-and-teesworks/
Nero
Well-known member
I know those in the PD Ports statement and would believe them every time over Dodgy Ben. Both Jerry and Frans are very decent people, who I have no doubt didn’t want it to go to court.Predictably #BentBen, his wingman #SimonClart and the STDC are spinning this furiously. The STDC statement is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the truth, saying that they didn't want to go to court, but PD Ports forced their hand. In reality Houchen's arrogance and hubris prevented an out-of-court settlement, and it's cost us £5m. Typical Tory, he doesn't care, it's not his money. He gambled on a big win as part of his re-election campaign, followed by a Bob-the-Builder construction cosplay photo op at South Bank Quay. Eat
North East Bylines doing a far better job than the Gazette, as usual https://northeastbylines.co.uk/judg...ess-in-legal-dispute-with-stdc-and-teesworks/
grumpyoldgit
Well-known member
Not sitting on the fence, then?Predictably #BentBen, his wingman #SimonClart and the STDC are spinning this furiously. The STDC statement is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the truth, saying that they didn't want to go to court, but PD Ports forced their hand. In reality Houchen's arrogance and hubris prevented an out-of-court settlement, and it's cost us £5m. Typical Tory, he doesn't care, it's not his money. He gambled on a big win as part of his re-election campaign, followed by a Bob-the-Builder construction cosplay photo op at South Bank Quay. Eat
North East Bylines doing a far better job than the Gazette, as usual https://northeastbylines.co.uk/judg...ess-in-legal-dispute-with-stdc-and-teesworks/
Teesside Crab Killer
Well-known member
lolNot sitting on the fence, then?
grumpyoldgit
Well-known member
And now the Gazette is reporting huge "potential" investment. Article no doubt dictated down the phone by Ben:
www.gazettelive.co.uk
Wind farm developer debunks reports of plans for £100m plant at Teesworks
A spokesman for the company said they were in the process of assessing options for the storage of monopiles destined for east cost wind projects
www.gazettelive.co.uk
1finny
Well-known member
It's a bit like wishing Johnson, Truss, Sunak, Gove, Patel, Braverman, et al wouldn't behave as they do.
As John Cooper Clarke has articulated many times - money and power corrupts
Teesside Crab Killer
Well-known member
Good morning grumpyoldgit. The Gazette is falling for #BentBen's spinAnd now the Gazette is reporting huge "potential" investment. Article no doubt dictated down the phone by Ben:
Wind farm developer debunks reports of plans for £100m plant at Teesworks
A spokesman for the company said they were in the process of assessing options for the storage of monopiles destined for east cost wind projects
as usual - "Copenhagen-based developer Ørsted is reportedly due to announce plans this week to build the factory at the UK's largest freeport". NO IT ISN'T. The deal, if there is one, is to build more monopiles at the SeAh factory which is being built at South Bank Quay right now. Ørsted never said that they were building another monopile factory. That simply doesn't make sense, Naomi Corrigan of the Gazette needs to stop copying and pasting TVCA press releases and do the fact-checking that she's supposed to be paid for. And, obvs, this press release is timed to try to bury Houchen's humiliation in the High Court yesterday. We'll give this one a while to see whether it translates into reality. They usually don't.
How Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen uses his media clout to create infrastructure projects out of thin air
Ben Houchen has"a long list of improbable “boondoggle” projects, many of which will never see the light of day"
northeastbylines.co.uk
StillCantPickAUsername
Active member
We’ve got super Ben Houchen 
He knows exactly what we need
He knows exactly what we need
Marineboysmoggy
Active member
More smoke and mirrorsAnd now the Gazette is reporting huge "potential" investment. Article no doubt dictated down the phone by Ben:
Wind farm developer debunks reports of plans for £100m plant at Teesworks
A spokesman for the company said they were in the process of assessing options for the storage of monopiles destined for east cost wind projects
Rishworthian
Well-known member
I remember as a kid being driven on the old road from Fisherman's crossing to South Gare probably early 50s. It went through the old Warrenby works and you were dodging trains etc. I was terrifiedWe’ve got super Ben Houchen
He knows exactly what we need
I've driven a thousand and one times since to the Gare without let, hindrance or payment. I'd suggest therefore that it is a public road and owned by neither of them
Juninhoburger
Well-known member
Comments are turned off on the article too. Absolutely pathetic.Good morning grumpyoldgit. The Gazette is falling for #BentBen's spin
How Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen uses his media clout to create infrastructure projects out of thin air
Ben Houchen has"a long list of improbable “boondoggle” projects, many of which will never see the light of day"
Front page of the Gazette is complete spin as well. People of Teesside are being lied to and it makes me furious that BenT is going to get away with this.