Defacing the Cenotaph and Churchill statue

Footlball Lads Alliance - a bunch of right wing racists and thugs parading as patriots.

Precisely. They're not doing anything to stop the war memorial being defaced stood where they are since the war memorial is about a 10 minute walk from where they are, which is the Lord Londonderry monument. Thick as mince
 
How would I know for sure, just like you I don't know about every country in the world.

My logical view is that the military in almost every country if not them all is recruited from its general population, but more then happy to be corrected if in some cases this is not so.
Try Syria and Libya where the "rebels" are funded by the CIA and supplied with arms and intelligence, including that supplied by the British.
There are als0 the Israeli`s, backed by the USA who are the tool of the West - a divisive Nuclear power which has unholy alliances with the likes of Saudia - Arabia, who rely on the USA, Britain and France for their majority of weapons.
Those weapons are being used in a proxy war against Yemen to commit genocide.
If we add in the CIA backed overthrow of the elected president in Bolivia and attempted coup in Venezuela - your "logical view" is very simplistic and untrue.
Recruitment of armed men and disciples isnt restricted to physical boundaries on a map.
Psychops ["Brainwashing"] isnt the privilege of a few select rogue states or terrorists.
Read up on the history of the Special Operations Executive, just to begin with.
The concept of "them" and "us", "good guy - bad guy" is a myth.

Military governance and purpose is muddied by self interest, subversion of democratic states, imperial motives, natural resources and colonialism.
 
Precisely. They're not doing anything to stop the war memorial being defaced stood where they are since the war memorial is about a 10 minute walk from where they are, which is the Lord Londonderry monument. Thick as mince
Agreed - to the uninitiated they are good patriots [nice footi fans] stopping those horrible people from defacing our memorial.
They are a bunch of opportunist rabble whose intention is to stir up discontent and violence.
 
Try Syria and Libya where the "rebels" are funded by the CIA and supplied with arms and intelligence, including that supplied by the British.
There are als0 the Israeli`s, backed by the USA who are the tool of the West - a divisive Nuclear power which has unholy alliances with the likes of Saudia - Arabia, who rely on the USA, Britain and France for their majority of weapons.
Those weapons are being used in a proxy war against Yemen to commit genocide.
If we add in the CIA backed overthrow of the elected president in Bolivia and attempted coup in Venezuela - your "logical view" is very simplistic and untrue.
Recruitment of armed men and disciples isnt restricted to physical boundaries on a map.
Psychops ["Brainwashing"] isnt the privilege of a few select rogue states or terrorists.
Read up on the history of the Special Operations Executive, just to begin with.
The concept of "them" and "us", "good guy - bad guy" is a myth.

Military governance and purpose is muddied by self interest, subversion of democratic states, imperial motives, natural resources and colonialism.

These are countries who own forces had been taken over.
 
And the inference is?
The Household Cavalry cleared it up by the way.
Good blokes who look after the memorials very well, shameful from the vandals! The restraint from those cleaning them up in the video was very impressive.
 
Good blokes who look after the memorials very well, shameful from the vandals! The restraint from those cleaning them up in the video was very impressive.
Yeah I agree.
There will always be idiots.

On the lighter side - it beats shoveling horse !!!! in those stables(y)
 
It was predictably self defeating to the cause defacing those statues, but it's certainly about time we started to look at the 'heroes' in a little more of a balanced light. It was a tactical mistake, but then it was individual choices to do that, not the actions of an organised rally.

Churchill was a bit of a b****d, certainly glorified in his own racism, wasn't particularly liked by many people that worked with and for him, almost certainly suffered from bi-polar, was immensely privileged and is 'arguably' a war criminal after targeting civilians. Yet he has been painted as an untouchable figure by many in this country.

I prefer to look through history through a bit more of a balanced lens. He was certainly a product of his time, but his racism was clear and shouldn't be airbrushed. He was flawed, but inspirational, a great orator, but sometimes saying appalling things, a leader in a time of trouble but not a man who could lead in normal times. The pragmatic view, is that we should be glad he lead us, but we should accept he was flawed. I'm not sure where I stand on the idea of removing statues of people that are tainted, because we wouldn't have any statues, but defacing them isn't a great look and plays into the hands of nationalist nutters and conservative figures.
 
What we class as racist now was mostly the normal back then. Just looked at tv programs in the 70/80 mocking black people which most of us laughed at. No one should spray anything on Churchill’s statue.
 
What you class as racist now was mostly the normal back then. Just looked at tv programs in the 70/80 mocking black people Which most of us laughed at. No one should spraying anything on Churchill’s statue
Only fools and horses is riddled with it, best programme ever made
 
What you class as racist now was mostly the normal back then. Just looked at tv programs in the 70/80 mocking black people Which most of us laughed at. No one should spraying anything on Churchill’s statue
I'm not sure it was entirely normal, most Brits probably never met a black man in their life so I doubt their racism was ever tested.
 
Back
Top