It's incredible isn't it. The evidence is there that Brexit was based on lies. It's taken away individual freedoms, made business more difficult, isolated the country politically and resulted in the worst UK government probably ever.It's funny how there is never a forward thinking thread re: Brexit. Like: How do we campaign to rejoin, based on information we now have (HV - I'm not pointing a finger at you).
Labour say's it won't campaign to rejoin, the Toried definitely won't.
Is there enough MP's out there to form a new party (similar to UKIP, Brexit Party) that specifically campaigns ro rejoin the EU?
My judgement is somewhat clouded by my pro-EU sentiment, but I'd even go as far to say that it could be an election winner for Labour, especially given that now we're seeing the importance of European unity.It's incredible isn't it. The evidence is there that Brexit was based on lies. It's taken away individual freedoms, made business more difficult, isolated the country politically and resulted in the worst UK government probably ever.
Yet still no political party dare that let alone campaign to rejoin.
It was a factor but the overwhelming reason we have the Tories was Corbyn and his cronies.resulted in the worst UK government probably ever.
The generational point is a very good one. I have said all along that it was a disgrace 16 and 17 couldn't vote. It was their generation who stood to lose a lot. They are now 22 and 23 living with the consequences of something they had no choice with.To answer the original question, I guess if I'd voted for Brexit I'd be saying that I did so on facts, not on the campaigns. The answer to a better future and the restoration of better relations with the rest of Europe lies not in persuading Brexit voters to change their minds, but in building support among those who didn't vote, and those who couldn't. Anyone who is currently younger than 24 didn't have a vote in 2016, and many who did vote for Brexit are not with us any more.
To answer the original question, I guess if I'd voted for Brexit I'd be saying that I did so on facts, not on the campaigns. The answer to a better future and the restoration of better relations with the rest of Europe lies not in persuading Brexit voters to change their minds, but in building support among those who didn't vote, and those who couldn't. Anyone who is currently younger than 24 didn't have a vote in 2016, and many who did vote for Brexit are not with us any more.
Here you go again with the 'I've been insulted' craic and looking for a rise out of people.No,but it is interesting that no brexit voters can answer thsi and yiu have chosen to insult me instead.
The last line interests me mate .....why ?We won't rejoin in a one off referendum type idiocy. A more fact based government will "synchronise our custom procedures" with our European neighbours and rejoin the "Single Market" at some point we might then allow freedom of movement between ourselves and our neighbours (just as we do with Ireland). We can do all of this without rejoining the EU (e.g. Norway or Switzerland) our only loss would be a place at the EU "table" when decisions are made. No need for a vote.
I believe this what a Starmer government will do, though you wont see it in any Labour Manifesto.
We need to learn to discuss openly and without rancour. I was actually more interested in the mechanics of how people's opinions formed and changed in the face of changing evidence and circumstance, rather than a debate on the pros and cons of the original decision.Admin this thread should be closed... it never ends well
Here are my thoughts Harry. I voted to leave the EU with the, flawed, understanding that we would remain in the single market and customs union. It was madness to leave those economic unions.We need to learn to discuss openly and without rancour. I was actually more interested in the mechanics of how people's opinions formed and changed in the face of changing evidence and circumstance, rather than a debate on the pros and cons of the original decision.
The generational point is a very good one. I have said all along that it was a disgrace 16 and 17 couldn't vote. It was their generation who stood to lose a lot. They are now 22 and 23 living with the consequences of something they had no choice with.
During the Scottish referendum 16 and 17 could vote as it was recognised and accepted the vote was massive with high potential consequences compared to a general election. The same should have happened with the EU vote.