newusername
Well-known member
Just come out and say Willy is crap with photoshop if that's the issue.
Just come out and say Willy is crap with photoshop if that's the issue.
Yet despite the thread title being not at all vague you've actually made more contributions to the thread than I haveNot trying to be patronising, just pointing out that this place is like gossip group at times and everything that is bad about the board.
The only suggestion is there is something wrong with the alignment of Princess Charlottes left hand...
I could have guessed which poster would already be all over this thread, anything Royal and he's on it like rabid dog. Obsessed
That won't be enough for some...
Queue the "anyone could have written that" lines
"Probably William while he has her locked up in his dungeon" might be another
Can everyone calm the fcuk down now then please? It’s like a women’s institute on here sometimes
Can everyone calm the fcuk down now then please? It’s like a women’s institute on here sometimes
Any chance for Boromart to spread his hatred for most things.Can everyone calm the fcuk down now then please? It’s like a women’s institute on here sometimes
Chipsticks aren't crisps though, are they?They're my favourite type of crisps along with Chipsticks; I'm not going to stop talking about them.
Apparently, there are too many leaves on the background tree for this time of the year.The only suggestion is there is something wrong with the alignment of Princess Charlottes left hand...
I could have guessed which poster would already be all over this thread, anything Royal and he's on it like rabid dog. Obsessed
yes the fingers bit isn't of any concern, there are far more obvious tell tale signs of photoshop manipulation, and of course there could be innocent explanations. What it appears to indicate is that Kate is unwilling or unable to take that family photo and it's a poorly composited shot from a couple of photos. The reason she is unwilling and unable, I'm not really going to speculate on, but the speculation exists from others purely because the royals have treated people like idiots thinking this poorly photoshopped image will be accepted without question.He's just double jointed. One of my kids does it.
How do you know are you a member of the WICan everyone calm the fcuk down now then please? It’s like a women’s institute on here sometimes
I could start with you if you likeAny chance for Boromart to spread his hatred for most things.
It's not really about the photo. There have been rumours and conspiracies, as highlighted by the fact this thread precedes the photo. When there are conspiracies and rumours and someone provides evidence to show that everything is alright but it is clearly photoshopped then all it does is fan the flames of those conspiracies rather than quell them. A photoshopped photo, even an innocently one, is the same as no photo at all (or worse even because it adds another layer to the conspiracy).I can’t believe this story over a photo. What a kerfuffle. People seem to be losing their minds over this.
I guess the difficulty they have is that whatever reason they have for creating a composite shot (which seems the most likely explanation), they would need to create the image from within the palace, not from an external company, for fear of leaking. Does Kensington Palace have it's own full time photoshop expert, probably not.It is quite feasible that it is just a composite of several shots. Plenty of phones do that as a feature these days. The bit I'm not sure about is that surely that always happens so why is this photo being returned for being altered and none of the previous ones have been? Do the media always do this? If they do then wouldn't the Royals know the rules around submitting photos to the media and wouldn't do that.
Although, if I was under suspicion for bumping off a member of the family and I was trying to cover the tracks with a photoshopped image of her on Mother's day then I'd probably use my considerable wealth to get someone that knows what they are doing to do it properly.