That is not necessarily the answer.
Yes I would. I have the no sponsor one from the Kris Boyd days and wear it regularly instead of more up to date ones.
Some sponsors may be less preferred by many, particularly gambling firms, but they seem to be the ones most keen to splash the cash, presumably in the interest of the fans.
Agree completely. It seems to be the 18+ sponsors i.e. gambling, alcohol, pawn shops that causes the most consternation. For me, anything that can't be put on a kids kit should be given the option of not being on the adult kit.
If you notice, the majority of elite clubs don't have them. They have the money and clout to avoid them, in other words, where the ambitious mid-market clubs chase the highest buck.
And this is why most clubs will be under contract not to sell sponsorless.
For me 100% also anyone under the age of 18 shouldn’t be walking round advertising for a gambling company, alcohol or cigarettes.
Has anybody got kids? They soon jump into Small, Medium at secondary school!! Plenty of 16year olds wearing Large, Extra Large and XXL - dunno what they feed some of them!
