Sheriff_John_Bunnell_ret
Well-known member
Yeah we would probably have stayed up.Imagine if we had agreed to the contract he was asking for that year too sherif. Swings and roundabouts that analogy.
Yeah we would probably have stayed up.Imagine if we had agreed to the contract he was asking for that year too sherif. Swings and roundabouts that analogy.
Akpoms was something like a goal ever 103 minutes, archer didn’t come close to that I don’t believe.Hmm. Well firstly I don't know what his goals per game ratio was compared to akpom. Akpom did have most of the preseason with his team mates. Archer had to "settle in" so not comparing like with like really. All things being equal over a season, both those in the same team, I would take archer to be top scorer.
He was awful after he left us and we would have been bankrupt. Gibson said he was asking for more than the gate recieptsYeah we would probably have stayed up.
I don't know sexpom. I would still take archer to score more next season of he were in our team. Of course there is no garuanttee that Akpom repeats last sessions accoutrements.Akpoms was something like a goal ever 103 minutes, archer didn’t come close to that I don’t believe.
Akpom was 118 per goal and archer was 141 and I think that includes the play offs.I don't know sexpom. I would still take archer to score more next season of he were in our team. Of course there is no garuanttee that Akpom repeats last sessions accoutrements.
Acoutraments? Achievements I meant to say.I don't know sexpom. I would still take archer to score more next season of he were in our team. Of course there is no garuanttee that Akpom repeats last sessions accoutrements.
Bang on.You are taking into account risk but not reward. Given that he has scored more goals than anyone has for 50 years, and that the reward of going up is in the tens of million, selling him is a terrible risk.
Every single transfer made in football is a gamble. The good clubs take the correct gambles. The bad ones sign Ashley Fletcher for 7 million.
I’m not sure how or why but Acoutraments made complete sense!Acoutraments? Achievements I meant to say.
Makes me sound clever too. It's not a word I would use, even to describe Acoutraments.I’m not sure how or why but Acoutraments made complete sense!
Obvious to you maybe.Really. It's bleeding obvious. Sure let's flog him for a set of tracksuits. It'll be 2070 the next time we have a goalscorer like that.
The mind boggles.
Akpom is for team Akpom not the Boro
Most likely not on one player, but it's a large investment that could be spread across a number of positions.The only way it makes sense is if you entirely remove the sporting perspective. There is absolutely no way the club would be able to parlay that ten million into 29 goals. 50 years of history tells us that.
This board is utterly mentalSell ASAP - a blind man could see Akpom was always going to leave after a Stella season last year. Akpom is for team Akpom not the Boro. Get what we can as soon as we can so we have some money to bring in Carrick’s choices. Keeping Akpom was always cloud cuckoo land from the desperate
So that’s how he scored so many goals, pre match Stella Artois.Sell ASAP - a blind man could see Akpom was always going to leave after a Stella season last year. Akpom is for team Akpom not the Boro. Get what we can as soon as we can so we have some money to bring in Carrick’s choices. Keeping Akpom was always cloud cuckoo land from the desperate
ATM moment we would be struggling fo one player to get that.Chuba will not have the same season again, not a chance, 12-15 goals max.