Agree. Depressing indeed. Tossers the lot of them.Well.. everyone pretended that they genuinely cared about the fate of the citizens in the Gaza Strip, but then used them to score political points/advantage.
All very typical and very depressing.
Depressingly that makes senseIn council terms...
It's basically like if someone told you who Bigfoot was on Masked Singer before you had chance to watch, and now there's no point in watching. And then you find out it might be that they only knew who Bigfoot was because they threatened to get Joel Dommett sacked if he didn't let them peep backstage.
That's the one bit I did understand...same as alwaysWell.. everyone pretended that they genuinely cared about the fate of the citizens in the Gaza Strip, but then used them to score political points/advantage.
All very typical and very depressing.
A bit like the cycle lane on Linthorpe Road....Well.. everyone pretended that they genuinely cared about the fate of the citizens in the Gaza Strip, but then used them to score political points/advantage.
All very typical and very depressing.
No. The Tories and the snp games we’re scuppered and they then threw their toys out of the pram with their big pretenceWell.. everyone pretended that they genuinely cared about the fate of the citizens in the Gaza Strip, but then used them to score political points/advantage.
All very typical and very depressing.
No. The Tories and the snp games we’re scuppered and they then threw their toys out of the pram with their big pretence
There’s a fair amount of truth in that as always when there’s a row in Parliament. But underneath it, this is still akin to a referee openly allowing a team to punch in the last-minute winner because the other team has been time wasting. Not his place to do. Ultimately, you need the referee to apply the rules or the system breaks down.No. The Tories and the snp games we’re scuppered and they then threw their toys out of the pram with their big pretence
this. With talk that he was basically pressured into doing so by having the threat made of support being withdrawn after the election if he didn'tThere’s a fair amount of truth in that as always when there’s a row in Parliament. But underneath it, this is still akin to a referee openly allowing a team to punch in the last-minute winner because the other team has been time wasting. Not his place to do. Ultimately, you need the referee to apply the rules or the system breaks down.
In the trivial world of football, and so much more in the more serious world of Constitutional politics. Treating the rules as optional leads at best to anarchy. I do think this one does, or should, transcend the partisan stuff a little. Even the speaker himself appeared to concede last night it was a catastrophic error of judgement.