dooderooni
Well-known member
I don't disagree, but a lot will depend on how the crowd react as that'll ultimately be the thing that forces Gibsons hand.Get beat on Tuesday and it might be quicker than that.
I don't disagree, but a lot will depend on how the crowd react as that'll ultimately be the thing that forces Gibsons hand.Get beat on Tuesday and it might be quicker than that.
No he isn’t, I just find it interesting that his name is the one mentioned every time whereas you hear nothing about Danks at all. The three of them are responsible for the coaching, surely.Is Woody above criticism? He was a top CB and ours are going backwards
It was already the worst - we're just increasing the gap over - or should that be under? - the previous worst ever
They are, but Woodgate and Carrick have the seniority and the overall responsibility so rightly the buck stops with them more than Danks.No he isn’t, I just find it interesting that his name is the one mentioned every time whereas you hear nothing about Danks at all. The three of them are responsible for the coaching, surely.
To be fair we defend like we did when he was manager, so maybe he is.Not coaching, by the looks of things.
If you say you can’t fault that and the players gave everything then you’re not being honest.View attachment 63711If that was everything, we really are screwed
He doesn't need to be honest to the media either by the way. As much as I disagree with his assessment here, it's obvious that he doesn't want to criticise the players in public and there's nothing wrong with that.If you say you can’t fault that and the players gave everything then you’re not being honest.
You can be critical of a team performance without throwing players under the bus. It's when manager's criticise individual players, then it can create issues.He doesn't need to be honest to the media either by the way. As much as I disagree with his assessment here, it's obvious that he doesn't want to criticise the players in public and there's nothing wrong with that.
Positives from today.
Dieng & Fry have had good games.
Bangura looks good.
I agree they do carry the can more than Danks but to me they’re all coaches. We’ve seen the footage of Carrick on the training field, he’s very hands-on. They’re all coaching but Carrick is the main man. I think he needs more help from his senior players TBH.They are, but Woodgate and Carrick have the seniority and the overall responsibility so rightly the buck stops with them more than Danks.
No it wasn’t. As I said two weeks ago the BBC either got that wrong or was using their “football, that’s the game that was invented in 1992” database again.It was already the worst - we're just increasing the gap over - or should that be under? - the previous worst ever
I thought Fry had a good gameDid you watch the game? Fry was his normal too slow, too laborious and absolutely clueless self. Unless he can pass sideways or back he is lost. He was constantly embarrassed by an average forward line. He is part of the problem not the solution. Another hugely overrated player by completely blinkered fans of ‘a local lad’. We have to find a way to get a new centre back pairing for n or we are in bigger trouble than we realise.
Hackney was awful as he has been all seasonTake aways are that Hackney is excellent
You can be critical of a team performance without throwing players under the bus. It's when manager's criticise individual players, then it can create issues.
All we want is a bit of honesty. If he honestly thought we played well today then that's his opinion, but it's concerning.