The 9am figures not disclosed yet?

Alvez_48

Well-known member
Ah ok so mustn't read it then even though it's just using data.

Rather than ignoring it because it doesn't fit your view take their evidence and dismantle it
 

Alvez_48

Well-known member
But you ignore the data you don't like bear 😉...

I've read the entire article whilst sat on a meeting, it's well written by an expert in the field and backed by hard data.

Please do point out how it's wrong @bear66 , @Jostler I'd be interested in your reasoning.
 
Last edited:

RandySavage

Well-known member
Does anyone else think @Alvez_48 is arguing just for arguments sake? He seems to want to shoot down every statistic, every reasoned thought, every theory without being able to provide anything of himself? I honestly have no idea what he thinks on the subject as when I asked him directly he ignored the question. He just seems to want to argue
Mate come on, that's not really fair is it? "Let's all just take one side of the argument"

Doesn't work like that.
 

SmallTown

Well-known member
Mate come on, that's not really fair is it? "Let's all just take one side of the argument"

Doesn't work like that.
I'm not saying that. Its just he seems to be arguing against things but not providing a counterpoint. Apart from unverified and biased website data. Im just wondering what his aim is if not to just argue
 

Alvez_48

Well-known member
I'm not saying that. Its just he seems to be arguing against things but not providing a counterpoint. Apart from unverified and biased website data. Im just wondering what his aim is if not to just argue

Hi please read the article and provide evidence to why the clinical pathologist is incorrect.

Their bias is no different to the guardians, the BBC's, the daily mails.

So again take the article evidence and show them to be wrong.
 

Jostler

Well-known member
But you ignore the data you don't like bear 😉...

I've read the entire article whilst sat on a meeting, it's well written by an expert in the field and backed by hard data.

Please do point out how it's wrong @bear66 , @Jostler I'd be interested in your reasoning.

I'll be honest I haven't read it. It was a joke, based on the URL. I'd have said exactly the same if it was a link from lockeverythingdownnow.com
 

Alvez_48

Well-known member
I'll be honest I haven't read it. It was a joke, based on the URL. I'd have said exactly the same if it was a link from lockeverythingdownnow.com

Please read the article and point out any errors and evidence to why the expert in question is wrong , if you can't it shows we are clearly over counting covid deaths yet again, so it would be worth dispelling.
 

Jostler

Well-known member
Please read the article and point out any errors and evidence to why the expert in question is wrong , if you can't it shows we are clearly over counting covid deaths yet again, so it would be worth dispelling.
I will have a read this evening and get back to you
 

bear66

Well-known member
As of 9am on 28 October, 942,275 people have tested positive for COVID-19 in the UK.

Positive cases were 24,701.

310 deaths were reported today.

58,925 deaths with Covid-19 on the death certificate.
 

Billy Horner

Well-known member
Today's headline analysis:

• 24,701 new cases reported in 24-hour period, up from yesterday's 22,885
• 7-day average for new cases decreases by 1.3% to 21,864 per day, following 1.0% increase yesterday
• 7-day average for new cases is 13.7% higher than one week ago (from 21.5% higher yesterday) and 38.7% higher than two weeks ago (from 47.9% higher yesterday and 34.6% higher 7 days ago)
• 310 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, down from 367 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test increases by 8.5% to 217 per day, following 9.9% increase yesterday (and 41st increase in the past 43 days)
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 51.2% higher than one week ago (from 47.3% higher yesterday) and 137.0% higher than two weeks ago (from 144.0% higher yesterday and 169.6% higher 7 days ago)
 
Top
X