I hope to god it's hypothetical, but imagine if the club sold Tav, and sorted his replacement, as a commercial decision, without having the input of Wilder? I think that would possibly make him leave.
Tav's the ideal player for our system, and I'm starting to hope that all of this is just speculation which has got out of hand, so the below comment from three weeks ago still stands:
"I’m not expecting any other (senior) departures apart from Djed. What I would say though is that if something ridiculous did happen, then would Steve reinvest the money? Yeah, he would. The names that always get bandied around are Djed, Tav and Dael – if all of a sudden we got a £60m bid, would Steve look at it? Yeah, he would. But he’d also then be adjusting what players we were able to go for ourselves. We’d be able to go for different targets because he would want to reinvest."
1) Is £12m the same as £60m, or a ridiculous bid? No, it's way below par (for Tav, not so much for Spence)
2) They would have known Tav's aspirations early July
3) They would have known if we had any informal or contractual agreements to let Tav go if there was a Premiership bid
4) We probably would have been expecting a bit from the Prem
5) We've not even spent a penny of the Spence money yet, never mind the supposed £12m from Tav
6) There's only another month till the transfer window closes
7) They will have known Payero was not staying
8) Tav's still got 2 years on his contract
It just doesn't make much sense to me. I don't even think £20m is a ridiculous bid for a young, English, left footed, box to box CM who doesn't seem to have any doubts about his professionalism. The only way the bid is ridiculous, is that it is ridiculously low if we don't have to sell, but I'm pretty sure that's not what Wilder was getting at.
If we were certain we could attract players, and their clubs would let them go, and we went out and spent £25m on a forward and a CM, and also got in a few free loans then I could understand it far better, but we would need a good 5/6 players and for most of them to pay off. Seems a bit of a tall order to do that within a month, and if we don't the season could well be over before it's started.
I can understand Forss (albeit he's not proven) but I don't get the Hoppe thing. Hoppe played like 185 minutes last year, for a la liga team who stayed up by a point, looks like he was their 4th choice and they are probably no better than us. They also paid 3.5m for him, but seemingly already want to cash in, seems very risky.