ThatFragranceGuy
Well-known member
How is representation decided on for these things?
Like the 18-21 rep, how are they agreed on given that they are "giving a voice" to youth supporters. How many 18-21 year olds go to the games and know they have a rep they can raise issues to?
Looks like Agenda hell to me. For this level of items to be discussed it seems like you would be better having key issues to discuss at the meeting, and an offline discussion where you send over bullets from each area to the club for a response and if the response warrants further discussion it goes on the main agenda.
Parmo in a bun is a travesty considering its the areas biggest food dish, as embarrassing as that is. when you get one you feel like you have been pranked. But that shouldnt really be anywhere near a supporters group key issues forum imo warranting all those people discussing it.
1 minute per supporters group to discuss new issues and feedback sounds like it will be fun banging through those
Like the 18-21 rep, how are they agreed on given that they are "giving a voice" to youth supporters. How many 18-21 year olds go to the games and know they have a rep they can raise issues to?
Looks like Agenda hell to me. For this level of items to be discussed it seems like you would be better having key issues to discuss at the meeting, and an offline discussion where you send over bullets from each area to the club for a response and if the response warrants further discussion it goes on the main agenda.
Parmo in a bun is a travesty considering its the areas biggest food dish, as embarrassing as that is. when you get one you feel like you have been pranked. But that shouldnt really be anywhere near a supporters group key issues forum imo warranting all those people discussing it.
1 minute per supporters group to discuss new issues and feedback sounds like it will be fun banging through those