It will cause more upset and toxicity now fromI suppose the logic is that this may give pause to any Newcastle fans intent on destroying what is normally the home end.
However, I do feel sorry for the Sunderland fans here, especially those for whom football is their life.
I think that must be the reason, although giving up a hospitality area to fans of a rival club is only going to lead to trouble. Not sure it’s worth the meltdown the Sunderland fans seem to be having however, genuinely wouldn’t care less if Boro did thisI suppose the logic is that this may give pause to any Newcastle fans intent on destroying what is normally the home end.
However, I do feel sorry for the Sunderland fans here, especially those for whom football is their life.
I agree to be honest. It’s just a function room, and I think I’d even welcome it if, for example, the opposition team were paying for it.genuinely wouldn’t care less if Boro did this
We seem to have been fortunate because the Riverside, whether by accident or design, allows multiple segregation options In the new away bit as well, so we can easily accommodate EFL, Premier League, league cup and FA Cup away quotas without doing anything drastic. So far as I can tell, Sunderland’s problem appears to stem from the fact that they can’t.I think part of the issue is that this is/was also the “traditional” home end? Which raises an interesting question about how to deal with large allocations of away fans in “new” stadiums that were “designed” to have away fans behind one goal and have in recent years rejigged that configuration.