Shamima Begum

This subject runs very high emotions but this is my take on it

1. What evidence has been given for grooming except her lawyer saying so? I can’t recall any being released

2. She travelled to Turkey of her own free will with two others… no one forced her and she had ample opportunity to ask for help.

3. We can’t ignore the crimes she committed… most would carry the death penalty in other countries

4. I am yet to see her so any remorse

5. Her tv interviews clearly show she is a danger and still believes in the ISIS Cause



That being said she is our problem and should be serving life without parole in a British jail.
 
Worth bearing in mind that adults can be groomed too. She may still be extremely vulnerable and whilst that isn’t a reason to strip her of her citizenship, I don’t think anyone can say with any conviction that she poses zero threat, we don’t know who she may still be in contact with and/or how likely it is she could be manipulated again.

The stakes are high, I don’t want any more children murdered in my or any other city, but I do appreciate that there is no simple solution and this precedent is dangerous too.
 
1. What evidence has been given for grooming except her lawyer saying so? I can’t recall any being released

2. She travelled to Turkey of her own free will with two others… no one forced her and she had ample opportunity to ask for help.

3. We can’t ignore the crimes she committed… most would carry the death penalty in other countries

4. I am yet to see her so any remorse

5. Her tv interviews clearly show she is a danger and still believes in the ISIS Cause
1. She went to a war zone and was instructed on how to do so to avoid being stopped

2. Grooming convinces people to do things that they would not otherwise do

3. I am not aware of her "committing" crimes, being witness to, yes, committing, no. Perhaps you could list the "punishable by death in other countries" crimes.

4. Have you looked?

5. Her TV interviews were conducted in a place where is is likely still aware of the reality of her situation should she disavow "the cause".

The fact remains she is British and should be brought back to face justice for what she has DONE AS A MINOR.
 
She could come back and radacalise others in a UK prison, which could then result in a terrorist attack being carried out on UK soil.

I accept absolving ourselves of responsibility isn't a good look but the British government and security forces have to prioritise our security and keeping us safe.
 
This subject runs very high emotions but this is my take on it

1. What evidence has been given for grooming except her lawyer saying so? I can’t recall any being released
"They also argued there was overwhelming evidence that Begum was “recruited, transported, transferred, harboured and received in Syria for the purposes of sexual exploitation”"

2. She travelled to Turkey of her own free will with two others… no one forced her and she had ample opportunity to ask for help.
You clearly have no idea what grooming means
3. We can’t ignore the crimes she committed… most would carry the death penalty in other countries
What crimes? You made the statement..... provide FACTS. What crimes?
4. I am yet to see her so any remorse
5. Her tv interviews clearly show she is a danger and still believes in the ISIS Cause
Where? Which one 'clearly' shows she is a danger. Prove it.

Just lots of typical Tory Press bland statements.
 
If she was white and had left to join a terrorist state, she'd still be scum.

I don't agree with the situation playing out with her, and she was groomed, clearly, but that doesn't mean she didn't have any agency in her actions.
I'm not sure the label 'scum' and the acceptance she was groomed accord in the same sentence.

The whole basis of children being groomed is that they are persuaded to act in a manner that they wouldn't of otherwise.
 
There must be some fairly strong mitigating evidence in this hush hush affair.

I like most thought she would win her appeal today.

The danger of her coming back is she wouldn’t be safe on the streets. The press would be all over her and she would attain some kind of celeb status in this messed up country which would anger people further. Truth be told for her own benefit it’s probably best she stays where she is - it may not be right but it’s probably for the best.
 
This subject runs very high emotions but this is my take on it

1. What evidence has been given for grooming except her lawyer saying so? I can’t recall any being released
She was married to a 21 year old fighter 10 days after arriving
2. She travelled to Turkey of her own free will with two others… no one forced her and she had ample opportunity to ask for help.
With Amira Abase and Kadiza Sultana. Their disappearance has been attributed to Aqsa Mahmood, a woman from Glasgow who joined ISIL in 2013. Samra Kesinovic, was beaten to death for trying to escape.
3. We can’t ignore the crimes she committed… most would carry the death penalty in other countries
I am unsure of the crimes..
4. I am yet to see her so any remorse
Difficult to know who the bad guy is when you’ve been left in refugee camp for eight years and watched your three kids die.
5. Her tv interviews clearly show she is a danger and still believes in the ISIS Cause
Why would she want to return to the UK and dress in a western style if this was the case?
That being said she is our problem and should be serving life without parole in a British jail.
Yeah.. sad
 
She could come back and radacalise others in a UK prison, which could then result in a terrorist attack being carried out on UK soil.

I accept absolving ourselves of responsibility isn't a good look but the British government and security forces have to prioritise our security and keeping us safe.
I'd suggest the security risk is not greater having someone locked up in the UK vs unmonitored overseas in a region where terrorism is rife.
 
"They also argued there was overwhelming evidence that Begum was “recruited, transported, transferred, harboured and received in Syria for the purposes of sexual exploitation”"


You clearly have no idea what grooming means

What crimes? You made the statement..... provide FACTS. What crimes?


Where? Which one 'clearly' shows she is a danger. Prove it.

Just lots of typical Tory Press bland statements.

Not sure what I have said would put me as a Tory… besides if you look at my other posts on this side you can clearly see I’m not
 
I'd suggest the security risk is not greater having someone locked up in the UK vs unmonitored overseas in a region where terrorism is rife.
Whilst that’s probably true, if she decides to blow herself up (it’s not as if no one does this) she isn’t going to kill as many Brits over there.
 
It's a tough one.

• Is it proven that she commited crimes while being a part of ISIS or was her crime that she joined ISIS? If she did commit crimes, can they be proven? If so she should be tried here and serve time here.
• Is she a risk to the public knowing her ideology? Lot's of people have radical ideology but would never act on it - how can you make people believe something??
• If she is a victim of grooming - who were the groomers - have they been prosecuted?

I used to think that she should be denied the right to return but I changed my mind - why should she be somebody elses problem - We should take responsibility and deal with her here via a trial
 
Back
Top