I think she & her friends knew exactly what she was doing & getting into.
Removing citizenship, if she had duel then it is a valid option.
Yes she was young, though age itself shouldn't be mitigation for her actions.
To be fair, I think there's a difference between involving yourself in petty crime etc, compared to someone signing up to a well known terrorist organisation, with the intention (at the least) of championing a bunch of murderers.Thinking back to when I was 15 year old and what people down. You do things as a shock factor not fully releasing what the repercussions might be.
You are vulnerable and easy to coerce in the right conditions.
No that's why I said I'm not fully getting it. It's very complex and far too simplistic to nail this episode down to a black/white scenario. That why my comments are very much "" as I don't know enough of the whole case.I don't really agree that 15 is old enough to know what she was getting into. If you think back to that age you think you know everything and you don't really appreciate the intentions of others, and you haven't fully formed a degree of empathy that you gain through life experience.
You can apply the "knowing what they were getting into" to many forms of grooming.
Yep there should've been a fair assessment of her danger to society (which i suspect is non-existent), and punishment (or not) defined and applied in this country.No that's why I said I'm not fully getting it. It's very complex and far too simplistic to nail this episode down to a black/white scenario. That why my comments are very much "" as I don't know enough of the whole case.
Flipping it, if a 15 yr old stabs another teenager to death, should they be allowed to walk free as they didn't know what they were getting into? No. But did they realise the full life changing implications of their actions - only they know this.
The big thing for me is what should her punishment be - she's had her citizenship taken off her which I feel is wrong and like I said sets a very, very dangerous precedent.
but these groups convince kids that they're fighting a noble fight and promise them the world in return for signing up. It's brainwashing and grooming, that's how it works. Of course an adult taking a bacjwards step can see it's wrong.To be fair, I think there's a difference between involving yourself in petty crime etc, compared to someone signing up to a well known terrorist organisation, with the intention (at the least) of championing a bunch of murderers.
I was no angel myself at that age and did things which I regret but I still knew that murdering, torturing innocents was wrong, and never would have even considered associating myself with such people.
that is pretty much it. She will be monitored to the point of anything she does, the authorities will know.......so forming a terror cell or running away again will be nigh on impossible. Especially if she was banged up for a long time.Yep there should've been a fair assessment of her danger to society (which i suspect is non-existent), and punishment (or not) defined and applied in this country.
mmmmm what? No idea what point you're trying to make.OK so at 15 you don't know what the f%ck a terrorist organisation is and everything it stands for.
But at 16 you know what each political party is about and what they stand for , and therefore according to Labour should be able to vote .......mmmmmmm
I agree it’s not as simple as that. There will be some folk who hated her from day one though largely because she wore a hijab, but it’s not the whole picture.Why are people on this thread saying if she was white it would be a different outcome? It has nothing to do with her colour. Stop trying to label people as racist, cause that's what you are doing, if they agree that her citizenship has been rejected.
Neither did she so why say it?take part in atrocious acts against fellow humans.
Only a ton? It’s nearly at 50 after only half an hour.
She didn't stab anyone. Another tenous argument to try and smear someone who was a vulnerable girl.Flipping it, if a 15 yr old stabs another teenager to death, should they be allowed to walk free as they didn't know what they were getting into?
She’s a security risk, the security services have weighed in with evidence to suggest this.but these groups convince kids that they're fighting a noble fight and promise them the world in return for signing up. It's brainwashing and grooming, that's how it works. Of course an adult taking a bacjkwards step can see it's wrong.
We don’t actually *know* what she did though. She may have done almost nothing but observe, but she may also have done some pretty bad stuff too.She didn't stab anyone. Another tenous argument to try and smear someone who was a vulnerable girl.
So just stop her coming back then.We don’t actually *know* what she did though.
She was a child. That is what the laws says. What has Labour got to do with it?OK so at 15 you don't know what the f%ck a terrorist organisation is and everything it stands for.
But at 16 you know what each political party is about and what they stand for , and therefore according to Labour should be able to vote .......mmmmmmm