Her skin color has nothing to do with it. Her ideology does. Luckily in this country we’re more tolerant than the cause she joined. We rule by law whereby protected characteristics don’t feature in the outcome.
I’ve been in war zones and seen her ideology. It’s not pretty. If there is 0.00000001% chance she would be a threat then it’s the right outcome.
You're saying "her ideology", based on what she was groomed into, and god knows how that was done, but if it was anyone's daughter on here then I'm sure there would be a lot more empathy with the girl and a lot more focus on her groomers. I doubt she went there to get married to some other bloke within 10 days (when she was 15), and have 3 kids before she was 19, which all died (malnutrition and disease, says a lot about the conditions), doubt she wanted that either. Since her "marriage" was when she was 15, it's 100% guaranteed she was raped from day 10 at least, and at least technically until she was 16 (in the eyes of UK law), but probably the entire time she was there. Considering she was either pregnant, recovering, getting pregnant or with a kid for practically the entire time she was there it's not like it would even be possible she would have had the time or training to even do anything remotely high profile, or likely damaging, other than satisfying the ISIS groomers.
It's like saying someone with Stockholm Syndrome is fault, like they chose to be kidnapped, and because they either started believing it, felt forced to believe it, or couldn't get out of it then it's 100% their own fault, which is crazy aimed at a 15 year old girl. It's not like she was dropping bombs from planes on civilians etc.
I've been to war zones too, three trips in total, most of the time it was going because we had been conned by the yanks into thinking they were a threat or even fighting a different threat in their place (most of the public and MP's were conned too). Some might say we were groomed the same way, except we were fully adult males.
Even worse happened in Vietnam, loads of Americans conscripted into fighting a war which couldn't even be won, and they 100% did not want to go, where loads of civilians got killed, were the conscripts (on either side) at fault too? They even **** on them when they got back too, nice.
Same as the Russians on the front lines in Ukraine, loads of them don't want to fight but they have to or they get shot by their own side. Those who do want to fight (who are actually doing the fighting) have largely been groomed into it (their whole life, based on lies), and other wise they would not be there killing Ukrainians, it's only the top brass, or those making money from it who want the actual fighting or the end result, but they're not doing the fighting of course.
Anyone going to a trained conflict is much more of an increased threat to the public, even if they were fighting for the good side, groomed into fighting for the pretend good side, groomed into fighting for the bad side, or groomed into fighting the supposed bad side. War does terrible things to good and bad people, and has messed up many minds. Lots of the lads who I came back with were a nightmare out in public and would literally knock people out for "looking at them the wrong way", when they had literally done nothing wrong. Sure, you can't and shouldn't lock up those returning from your own side, on your own soil if you asked or groomed them into going. But as she was born in the UK, and only 15, which practically guarantees grooming and rape, then she's our problem, even if she was 100% into it or 0% into it.
