This annoys me so much.She's crying because she's been caught and is now facing the comeuppance.
It's a shame it's not going to go further, prosecution is required. She's part of a criminal gang.
Unfortunately its not a criminal offence to lie to a parliamentary committee. However I think she should be jailed she deliberately persisted with subterfuge knowing for a long time these people were innocent long before their court trials.Her lies are catching up with her.
She's crying because she's been caught and is now facing the comeuppance.
It's a shame it's not going to go further, prosecution is required. She's part of a criminal gang.
Depends whether she made the statement under oath, in which case she's guilty of perjury.Unfortunately its not a criminal offence to lie to a parliamentary committee. However I think she should be jailed she deliberately persisted with subterfuge knowing for a long time these people were innocent long before their court trials.
Is she in the note book…..‘don’t tell him yer name Paula’Turning on the water works
What an absolute disgrace
Hope your Chemo goes well LegzI turned Sky news on 2 minutes ago and have already heard "don't recall" and "no recollection". Good job I can't play any drinking games today (chemo at 1) as I'd be p!ssed by 11am....evil lying cow!!
Well briefed on how to respond but her incompetence is shining through. Absolute car crash TVI turned Sky news on 2 minutes ago and have already heard "don't recall" and "no recollection". Good job I can't play any drinking games today (chemo at 1) as I'd be p!ssed by 11am....evil lying cow!!
Are you sure she was under oathUnfortunately its not a criminal offence to lie to a parliamentary committee. However I think she should be jailed she deliberately persisted with subterfuge knowing for a long time these people were innocent long before their court trials.
I dont think she was. Nowt will happen to herAre you sure she was under oath
He says this to every witness in the enquiry not sure this is indicative of charges to be brought, although they have essentially caught her in perjury to the select committee and a few other lies over the first day and a half of her testimony here so fingers crossed it does.Vennells was warned by the Chair before speaking that she had a right not to incriminate herself in her answers.
So I think there is a very real chance of charges being brought. Starmer may well push for this. It is very much in his area of expertise and interest. Remember, he prosecuted some MP's over the expenses scandal and even a Cabinet Minister for perverting the course of justice. Not only that but his legal career was very much inspired by fighting these kinds of injustices by those in power against the little man.
I notice Jane MacLeod, the Post Office General Counsel (senior internal lawyer) for 2015-2019 has refused to co-operate and now lives abroad so cannot be compelled to attend. She was originally listed. Is that a coincidence or is there some legal jeopardy for her too?
Is that the case though. The major bit yesterday when she admitted giving wrong information she said words to the effect that the Post Office knew the information was incorrect but she didn't.He says this to every witness in the enquiry not sure this is indicative of charges to be brought, although they have essentially caught her in perjury to the select committee and a few other lies over the first day and a half of her testimony here so fingers crossed it does.
That was her words but materially she admitted that the information given was incorrect, based on the evidence in this enquiry I think it could be proven that she did know as there is written evidence that she did (although she denies this or tries to downplay its significance). KC Beer is doing a fantastic job of cutting through the many lies and "anomalies" (pardon the pun) in her witness statement, based on the evidence and the admission I think there could be enough to proceed with criminal case, at the very least a civil one where the burden of proof is lower.Is that the case though. The major bit yesterday when she admitted giving wrong information she said words to the effect that the Post Office knew the information was incorrect but she didn't.