Redknapp = Big club bum licker.Offers nothing other than inarticulate, stunted, obvious analysis. Painful to listen to. He's got a daft laugh though so that means he's brilliant in some peoples' eyes.
Redknapp isn't much better either, the c_ockney gob$hite.
I like Clinton but Michal is just dreadfulI know I'm in the minority, but I like Micah and I like Clinton Morrison. I have my own opinions when I watch football so to me the pundit is there to offer entertainment and Clinton and Micah both do this.
Re Morrison and Richards - I’m beginning to think i’m getting old and sky/bbc are simply employing these dreadful pundits to appeal to the yoof. I’m only 50.
Through a complete wobble on radio 5 a few weeks back when someone pronounced his name wrong and had to be calmed down by the moderator.I quite like Clinton — not just because of his of obvious cheeky character but also he comes over as honest. Micah meanwhile tends to be more or less predictable and while his opinion is sometimes unbiased I tend to think he’s more bothered about his image than anything else.
To be honest, don't really think we need a presenter, 3 pundits and 2 commentators to understand what we're watching and Glenn Hoddle does my head in.The punditry off our football has turned into a mini entertainment industry in its own right. It's mainly a load of ****, lowest common denominator, candy floss for the Sky generation. Anyone who wants real insight into the sport is wasting their time watching.