Lots of anti-Marxists in Hungary

If I can put it into a boxing match a bloke 18 stone (pro Remain spend) lost to a bloke 13 stone ( pro Brexit spend) they are arguing that the result should be cancelled because the 13 stone bloke wore red boots and the rules said white.
No. The 13 stone bloke had horse-shoes in his gloves.

He then stabbed the 18 stone bloke with a broken bottle.
 
What do you want to happen then,another referendum,turn the decision over,just rejoin?. Maybe you can form a political party and campaign on all three of the above just to make sure. As stated, enjoy the moral high ground,
I want you to answer the questions.

Do you think we spend too much money prosecuting crime because it's already been done?

Should murderers get a pass because their victims are dead regardless?
 
No. The 13 stone bloke had horse-shoes in his gloves.

He then stabbed the 18 stone bloke with a broken bottle.
Nah, the big bloke had; TUC, CBI, the government of the day, a pamphlet to every house, £18m, lib Dems. Labour party, greens, SNP in their corner, they would have noticed.
 
Nah, the big bloke had; TUC, CBI, the government of the day, a pamphlet to every house, £18m, lib Dems. Labour party, greens, SNP in their corner, they would have noticed.
You chose the ridiculous analogy and then messed it up spectacularly.

It was never about spend. It was about how the spend was targeted and how much of that was illegal.

The pamphlet to every house was a legal requirement.

The government of the day was NOT the remain campaign.

The Labour Party have been called pro-remain and pro-leave - which is it?
 
I want you to answer the questions.

Do you think we spend too much money prosecuting crime because it's already been done?

Should murderers get a pass because their victims are dead regardless?
Your analogy is not relevant, I will leave it at this, for better or for worse and despite the circumstances of how the referendum was decided we have left, That was and is my only point.Only Time will tell the outcome.
 
You chose the ridiculous analogy and then messed it up spectacularly.

It was never about spend. It was about how the spend was targeted and how much of that was illegal.

The pamphlet to every house was a legal requirement.

The government of the day was NOT the remain campaign.

The Labour Party have been called pro-remain and pro-leave - which is it?

It’s all been explained to him ad infinitum. He is either incapable of understanding it or is unwilling to. He will continue to spout this rubbish. He will continue to claim that people are saying that all Leave voters are racist. In the end I had to use the ignore button. Probably a troll

Your analogy is not relevant, I will leave it at this, for better or for worse and despite the circumstances of how the referendum was decided we have left, That was and is my only point.Only Time will tell the outcome.

It’s your only point now that the rest of the points you made have been shown up as the rubbish they are. It remains as irrelevant a point in this discussion as it was when you first made it.

We are out, probably best that you accept it.

Nobody is arguing that we haven’t left. So who is it that you think hasn’t accepted it?
 
Last edited:
It’s all been explained to him ad infinitum. He is either incapable of understanding it or is unwilling to. He will continue to spout this rubbish. He will continue to claim that people are saying that all Leave voters are racist. In the end I had to use the ignore button. Probably a troll



It’s your only point now that the rest of the points you made have been shown up as the rubbish you are. It remains as irrelevant a point in this discussion as it was when you first made it.



Nobody is arguing that we haven’t left. So who is it that you think hasn’t accepted it?
I think you're trolling now, I'm out.
 
As I said earlier, that’s probably for the best. It always happens when someone’s arguments are dismantled. They leave the thread.
Ok one more response, I have no feelings ether way about the referendum, I made the throwaway comment the people have spoken, perhaps I should have added for better or for worse.. But I think it's reasonable to say some people have not accepted the result. As I have stated twice, enjoy your moral high ground. You are right and I am wrong.
 
Ok one more response, I have no feelings ether way about the referendum, I made the throwaway comment the people have spoken, perhaps I should have added for better or for worse.. But I think it's reasonable to say some people have not accepted the result. As I have stated twice, enjoy your moral high ground. You are right and I am wrong.

So who on this thread specifically hasn’t accepted the result?
 
Back
Top