Leicester only 3 defeats at home only concede 9

Although they have good results at home. Ive seen/heard many reports of team dominating them for large spells but leicester are clinical. We had our luck with them missing some great chances for a change.
 
Although they have good results at home. Ive seen/heard many reports of team dominating them for large spells but leicester are clinical. We had our luck with them missing some great chances for a change.
They certainly weren’t clinical yesterday - they missed at least three absolute sitters, luckily for us. Great result for us, but looking at those misses we were quite lucky they had an off day in front of goal.
 
They certainly weren’t clinical yesterday - they missed at least three absolute sitters, luckily for us. Great result for us, but looking at those misses we were quite lucky they had an off day in front of goal.
Not sure if it was you or another poster who said this on another thread. Leicester didn't have 3 sitters. Their xg was 2.1. They created 2 or 3 good chances, not sitters.
 
They certainly weren’t clinical yesterday - they missed at least three absolute sitters, luckily for us. Great result for us, but looking at those misses we were quite lucky they had an off day in front of goal.
Evens it out a bit, how many games have we missed loads of chances only for the opposition to hit us on the break. Nice to see a bit of luck going our way for a change
 
Two definite sitters IMO
I would define a sitter as an open goal. Can't be missed under normal circumstances. A penalty! Is that a sitter? If so it has an xg of. 76,because 76 out of a hundred are scored. Does that make it a sitter? Not according to Opta.

Of course you are free to have your own definition as is merlin. Does make any conversation about chances rather pointless if there isn't an agreed definition.
 
Back
Top