Kate, Princess of Wales - not seen this year.

Starbuck said:
Apparently the notifications are issued if the photo is released without detail of where changes have been made. In this instance whoever it is who checks these things has a doubt about the junior princess's left hand and without verification from the issuer about what might have been changed they have to stop further circulation. Sounds like a storm in a teacup to me.
Click to expand...

There are many more alterations than just the left hand and if it was just that issue, then the original could have been sent to end this "storm".

"Kill notices" are rare, especially on high profile clients such as this.

It just all seems very unnecessary.
 
AytonMews said:
So whilst recovering from a serious illness, she has not only been coerced into releasing a fake photo, but now made to tell outright lies to the world about the editing of the photo?


It seems a stretch, like.
Click to expand...
Or the royal machine has just done all of this without her involvement, which very plausible. You think she operates their twitter account do you? :ROFLMAO:
 
AytonMews said:
Would a kill notice be given if the photo had been put together from a series of similar photos so that all the kids were looking at the camera etc?

I don’t really know the rules
Click to expand...
the kill notice would be given ONLY if the raw files of the originals had not been provided, and it had materially affected the message. So if it was just a bunch of photos stitched together so the kids looked at the camera then the originals would be provided and it would all be good. It's pretty implausible that the explanation is that simple. The royals would have provided the originals and it wouldn't have been killed.
 
atypical_boro said:
The rumours about William and Rose Hanbury have been all over the internet for years. Of course they're rumours and are not confirmed, but they've been reported in hundreds of publications, not just this thread. Google it if you don't believe me.
Click to expand...
I'm not saying I don't believe you. I've never heard of Rose Hanbury (unless they were named upthread and the name's gone right past me). There's this message board and one other that I access on a daily basis and two others I look at several times a week and this is the only one where I've seen any of this sort of thing.
 
Capybara said:
I'm not saying I don't believe you. I've never heard of Rose Hanbury (unless they were named upthread and the name's gone right past me). There's this message board and one other that I access on a daily basis and two others I look at several times a week and this is the only one where I've seen any of this sort of thing.
Click to expand...
Yes the Rose Hanbury story has been going for several years, and of course royal princes and kings have been reknowned for having a wife and a lover. It's almost tradition.

I'm not sure that is the cause of all this though.

Another rumour that has done the rounds, particularly in foreign press is that she has battled with bulimia. It was something I didn't really pay any attention to as an internet rumour. However she was last year twice seen with two bandaged fingers twice a couple of months apart. One of the tell tale signs of bulimia is the skin on the fingers used to induce vomit becomes damaged because of the regular stomach acid. Of course her recent hospitalisation is for an abdominal operation, and bulimic people have issues with abdomen because of the reflux and often require operations to resolve the damage caused. Those two bits of evidence align with that theory.....but of course it's hardly a smoking gun. But would also align with wanting to keep her out of the public eye for a while.

I'd need far more evidence to believe that theory though but it's more plausible than held against her will etc.
 
Last edited:
Capybara said:
I'm not saying I don't believe you. I've never heard of Rose Hanbury (unless they were named upthread and the name's gone right past me). There's this message board and one other that I access on a daily basis and two others I look at several times a week and this is the only one where I've seen any of this sort of thing.
Click to expand...
OK, well there seemed to be an implication that these rumours are not known outside of this thread/board - they are. And it wouldn't be the first time rumours like this turn out to be true, or that the wife of an heir apparent/future Head of State has been utterly, publicly humiliated to the detriment of her mental health and wellbeing.

That's what people are concerned about, rather than just 'gossip'. She is not a footballers' wife, she is the wife of the future Head of State, he who cannot be removed. Politicians' personal lives/conduct are discussed on here all the time, seems strange that the future King's shouldn't be.
 
Last edited:
Why would an apparently healthy youngish woman need a hysterectomy?
If she does have health problems the public should have the right to know, since we are funding their parasitic lives and they interfere in public issues in a daily basis. Of course no such rights exist, which is the point of a monarchy.
 
Matt said:
Surely that just looks similar because it is in fact the same person, with the same face doing the same pose/smile that she has done a million times a day since becoming a part of this whole circus
Click to expand...
Yeah. It's obvious it's not the same photo when you isolate and compare the faces, someone has done that on the tweet if you scroll down a bit. Still funny though the effort that went into it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top