indeedido
Well-known member
You can make if an enormous word.There’ll be 10,000 at his first game.. and rightly so. Disgrace if this is true.
I wouldn't be entirely surprised if Gibson appointed Cattermole, but it would be absurd.
You can make if an enormous word.There’ll be 10,000 at his first game.. and rightly so. Disgrace if this is true.
are you a disgruntled ex Bulkhaul employee?You are spot on.
Gibson loves everyone to think he has covered the debt he has created. He has only covered it if he actually writes it off by converting that debt to equity. If he does that, then the club immediately has value to a potential buyer who might even pay him something for his equity, which would be fair.
The problem is that Gibson believes only he can actually run the club and that he has a life long entitlement to do so.
He is addicted to the adulation and will never want to lose the power.
He will only sell the club if he comes out financially covered, but he has made such a mess of the club nobody will take it off his hands in its current state, let alone buy it, let alone keep him involved.
We had a terrible time in 1986 until Henderson, Fordy and Moskowitz saved the club. We rose very quickly, debt free, under new ownership. That was with trivial debt in today's football world.
A number of other clubs have done this and currently sit in the PL.
Derby will pass us in the near future.
If the only person impacted is Steve Gibson, from him writing the debt to self off, then there seems some justice.
He would perhaps then ride off having ACTUALLY put the money into the club that people think he has, ACTUALLY paying for the ramifications of the mistakes of his leadership since 2006.
Don't hold your breath.
But no worries, Katie will ride into the rescue after Dad fairly shortly. Won't that be special...
At least we’ll get to see loads of plays at the Riverside. It needs more tickets/season tickets content.You are spot on.
Gibson loves everyone to think he has covered the debt he has created. He has only covered it if he actually writes it off by converting that debt to equity. If he does that, then the club immediately has value to a potential buyer who might even pay him something for his equity, which would be fair.
The problem is that Gibson believes only he can actually run the club and that he has a life long entitlement to do so.
He is addicted to the adulation and will never want to lose the power.
He will only sell the club if he comes out financially covered, but he has made such a mess of the club nobody will take it off his hands in its current state, let alone buy it, let alone keep him involved.
We had a terrible time in 1986 until Henderson, Fordy and Moskowitz saved the club. We rose very quickly, debt free, under new ownership. That was with trivial debt in today's football world.
A number of other clubs have done this and currently sit in the PL.
Derby will pass us in the near future.
If the only person impacted is Steve Gibson, from him writing the debt to self off, then there seems some justice.
He would perhaps then ride off having ACTUALLY put the money into the club that people think he has, ACTUALLY paying for the ramifications of the mistakes of his leadership since 2006.
Don't hold your breath.
But no worries, Katie will ride into the rescue after Dad fairly shortly. Won't that be special...
Will Katie take over running his empire too I wonder?You are spot on.
Gibson loves everyone to think he has covered the debt he has created. He has only covered it if he actually writes it off by converting that debt to equity. If he does that, then the club immediately has value to a potential buyer who might even pay him something for his equity, which would be fair.
The problem is that Gibson believes only he can actually run the club and that he has a life long entitlement to do so.
He is addicted to the adulation and will never want to lose the power.
He will only sell the club if he comes out financially covered, but he has made such a mess of the club nobody will take it off his hands in its current state, let alone buy it, let alone keep him involved.
We had a terrible time in 1986 until Henderson, Fordy and Moskowitz saved the club. We rose very quickly, debt free, under new ownership. That was with trivial debt in today's football world.
A number of other clubs have done this and currently sit in the PL.
Derby will pass us in the near future.
If the only person impacted is Steve Gibson, from him writing the debt to self off, then there seems some justice.
He would perhaps then ride off having ACTUALLY put the money into the club that people think he has, ACTUALLY paying for the ramifications of the mistakes of his leadership since 2006.
Don't hold your breath.
But no worries, Katie will ride into the rescue after Dad fairly shortly. Won't that be special...
I'm not a Bulkhaul employee.are you a disgruntled ex Bulkhaul employee?
Gibson should run your written remarks past his lawyers
a multiple promotion winning manager who slagged us all off and couldn't manage 1 point per game. the love in for Wilder needs to stop, he didn't want to be here and he couldn’t or wouldn’t cut it.I’m trying to hold my court and not get worked up until we hear something official.
A lot of people will feel rightly ***ed off if we get rid of a multiple promotion winning, Premier League Manager of the year achieving gaffer and appoint a locally based former player that has never ever even managed an U21 team never mind a first team, alongside a coach who’s last involvement here was 1 win in multiple games that relegated us.. after apparently scouring Europe for the right man.
Not a lot of difference in the coaches they've worked with, the amount of time in the first team set-up, being in charge of one of the biggest clubs in the world for a few games and the contacts they have in the game to call upon for advice or to loan players maybe?Tbh theres not alot of difference between carrick or cattermole on ciaching terms. Yet people would accept carrick. If it came to the crunch of either of these two id pick the local lad not some newcadtle
Shhhhh we don't want to hear that. We enjoy frothing at the mouth too much about milk that's not yet spilled.I’ve heard from somebody within the club that Cattermole will not be getting the job
I have also heard the same. Heard it’s between edwards and carrick still.I’ve heard from somebody within the club that Cattermole will not be getting the job
Carrick could bring two highly experienced and successful Premier League coaches.Tbh theres not alot of difference between carrick or cattermole in coaching terms. Yet people would accept carrick. If it came to the crunch of either of these two id pick the local lad not some newcadtle supporter who doesnt fancy the job really
Interesting. I was quite intrigued by Wolf having read some of the articles about him.I have also heard the same. Heard it’s between edwards and carrick still.
It’s all hearsay and rumours until it’s announced by the club.So many people ITK with conflicting information. Who to believe