If we'd got Warnock instead of Pulis..

You’ve said it multiple times, you’ve refused to give him any credit. Unless of course you which to correct that now and give Pulis credit for his role in Traore’s development?

Everton wanted us to pay Bolasie’s £70,000 a week wages, which we were unwilling to do and Villa were. You’d have to have to been an absolute simpleton to blame that on Pulis.

@marve
You’ve said it multiple times, you’ve refused to give him any credit. Unless of course you which to correct that now and give Pulis credit for his role in Traore’s development?

Everton wanted us to pay Bolasie’s £70,000 a week wages, which we were unwilling to do and Villa were. You’d have to have to been an absolute simpleton to blame that on Pulis.

Interesting that @Marvanelli chooses to hide when challenged on his previous statements.

Without question the dumbest poster on this message board.
 
@marve


Interesting that @Marvanelli chooses to hide when challenged on his previous statements.

Without question the dumbest poster on this message board.

I've not been on the board all weekend. But nice of you to lower yourself to insults. Very big and hard sat behind a keyboard.

As for your question. What credit does Pulis deserve being 'Boro manager? Spending a whole lot of money on players we didn't need? Leaving us with a squad worse than where he found it? Leaving us with the most unbalanced squad I think I've ever seen. Selling our best striker without having a replacement lined up? I could go on...

I see you specifically ignored my comments about the 2nd leg against Villa and Pulis' tactics and choice of subs. Doesn't fit with your status of Pulis being the right man that does it?

Like I said. You seriously need to get over Pulis. He's gone. For the good of the club.

He failed when he was here

Yet again you got it wrong.

Man up, accept you got it wrong about Pulis and move on.

Oh and a little tip. Don't resort to insults. It makes you look very silly.
 
Back
Top