If Any Future Lockdowns- Should Be The Unvaccinated

I suspect this has probably gone as far as it can.

We are all entitled to an opinion however unpalatable that opinion is to others,assuming, of course it isn't illeagal.
 
Ted_DN38416 said:
No offence but you and others on this thread are coming accrossas bombastic pr!cks. Anyway have a goodun
Click to expand...
No offence taken, as I don't really value what you seem to be insinuating.

Anti-vaxers have already unfortunately been brainwashed at best, to the detriment of theirs and public health. Or, at worst, they're selfish pricks that expect to ride the benefits/ freedoms that others have given them by being vaccinated. Not to mention helping to not overwhelm healthcare, so there's a bed for the anti-vaxers if they need it. My priority is protecting healthcare, if that's at the marginal cost of the ill informed or deniers, then so be it.
 
Last edited:
borgelite said:
I just thought that aswell, why is following what top doctors and scientists say Hitler like.
Some strange views, good job our parents didn't have fews like that about other diseases
Click to expand...
I haven't heard a scientist suggest we prioritise treating vaccinated people over unvaccinated. That is the main point being alluded to by Tom. You can't hide behind a scientist on this one.
 
borgelite said:
Bombastic - saying things with little meaning 🤔
More people vaccinated = slow in spread
Click to expand...
You cant even get the definition of a word right:
high-sounding but with little meaning; inflated.
"bombastic rhetoric"

That sums up about eight or nine posters on this thread. Anyway have a goodun.
 
BoroMart said:
any measure will always take 6-8 weeks to be apparent in the data.
Click to expand...
I think the trajectory of the line of cases, on a log scale, will change much quicker than that, but some of it is already baked in. Should hopefully see things slow quickly in a couple of weeks.

I think they're only planning on doing it for 10 days, but that will get extended I expect.
 
borgelite said:
I just thought that aswell, why is following what top doctors and scientists say Hitler like.
Some strange views, good job our parents didn't have fews like that about other diseases
Click to expand...
That isn't what I'm saying and you know it. Laughing put it perfectly.
 
Tom_Boro said:
It should definitely be a choice. I'm pro vaccine but I'd never want to force someone to take it. That's just wrong.
Click to expand...
We'll have to agree to disagree. There were a few people fired where I worked, but, as far as I'm aware, none of them were front line staff.
 
NYboro said:
It should not be a choice. It affects other people as well.
Click to expand...
Where does it stop?

Stopping kids been born to help with climate goals? That won't be a hurdle anymore if vaccination isn't a choice as we would already have given whoever is in charge control over our bodies. Extreme scenario but it's been mentioned on here plenty of times in the past about reducing the rate at which people have kids to make things more sustainable on this planet.
 
Randy said:
Where does it stop?

Stopping kids been born to help with climate goals? That won't be a hurdle anymore if vaccination isn't a choice as we've already given whoever is in charge control over our bodies. Extreme scenario but it's been mentioned on here plenty of times in the past about reducing the rate at which people have kids.
Click to expand...
The world's birth rate has massively slowed in the last 50 years anyway, and is still slowing further in the developed world.

The UK is about 1.7 I think, so 1.7 kids per women and it takes two to tango. I think 2.1 maintains the current population to average life expectancy. Not sure how that stacks up with population forecasts mind, and whether they expect that low birth rate to continue.

I don't think stopping people having kids is the answer, and they will be needed to make amends for the fossil fuels already burned in the worlds quest for growth. They're also going have to look after all us old buggers, it's double crap for them!

Do you feel under control because you chose to have a vaccination? I certainly don't, I feel quite good about it, never mind reducing the risk to myself.

Do you think that future vaccinations wouldn't be a net benefit to public health? Actually that net benefit probably isn't good for climate change, but I don't think killing of the oldies is the answer either.
 
Ted_DN38416 said:
If youre going to have opinions that promote the dubious and misguided segregation of society. Close enough isnt going to cut it.
Click to expand...
What's dubious and misguided about it? If people choose to segregate themselves, you can hardly blame the others.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top