If Any Future Lockdowns- Should Be The Unvaccinated
- Thread starter borgelite
- Start date
the_holgate_roof
Well-known member
Can’t argue with that, it may give them time to reflect…..
the_holgate_roof
Well-known member
Vaccine passports maybe???
Surely it should the individuals responsible to prove they've been vaccinated, this time last year I was twice in a pub when covid inspectors came in and gave the landlord grief.
Instead of giving people making a living the grief give it to the selfish individuals not being jabbed.
If you can't show them your vaccinated then leave the public venue.
Last edited:
the_holgate_roof
Well-known member
Totally agree, challenge the individuals but in practicality that means venues have to enforce.
Last year I honestly witnessed, covid inspectors measuring distances between tables etc which in reality is rubbish, just come in target individuals not the premises
afcb_acklam
Well-known member
I've heard of the bottom inspectors, but never covid ones
Call them what you want, but it's not difficult is it
SNOWBANDIT
Active member
We could be being "vaccinated" for years - how long are we to wish pariah on others? do vaccinated people not pass on COVID?
Middlesbrough123
Well-known member
Why should we stop at Covid maybe we should have health pass ports for numerous other contagious diseases .
Druss_The_Legend
Well-known member
After the lockdowns it took months to get my head around not being locked down. Everytime the police drove past I was expecting to get stopped and asked if it was an essential journey. Lockdown didn't really bother me as I'm pretty antisocial anyway, but I think it will have longer psychological effects on the younger generations. My 2 year old twins where born in September 2019 and they never really knew life without being in lockdown so didn't get the social interactions with family and friends and the development stage. My eldest daughter is 13 she started senior school in the September before lockdown and has missed a large chunk of her senior school life, she now has major anxiety about going into school, but can't get seen by anyone or get help as CAMMS are that over stretched with kids in the same situation they will only see kids who are suicidal or self harming. So it's the long term effects on the younger generations who are least affected by COVID who I think will feel the long term negative effects of it.
locomansimon
Well-known member
Why
Laughing
Well-known member
The simple point he is making is that locking people up when no crime has been committed is wrong. It's a simple concept and whilst I don't agree with it, it is unconstitutional in most countries and goes against our basic principles of justice.
Muttley
Well-known member
I don't recall being incarcerated, did I miss something? It is logical to take measures on a societal level to avoid bodies piling high.
Laughing
Well-known member
I agree, that doesn't make it a legal action though, because you and I agree with it.
Laughing
Well-known member
That sounds a bit like Jewish segregation and we know what followed that.
Muttley
Well-known member
Legislation would make it a "legal" action.
The ridiculous hyperbole over denying access to entertainments (e.g. excluding the unvaccinated from attending gigs or indoor sports events) is hardly analogous to incarceration. If those who choose to not take the vaccine are a bit upset because they can't watch their favourite boy band at the local arena then tough. I don't think that is at all draconian. I'm all done with the stupid parallels with some sort of Police State. FFS take the jab or do without seeing Kylie for a few months.