Ghislane Maxwell

Her third attempt at getting bail and she graciously says that she is prepared to revoke both her British and French citizenship in order to get it. The 'husband' gets mentioned again too:


(Please note: To avoid any confusion, my opening line is awash with sarcasm!)
 
Knee to knee on the loo and feeling humiliated - I very much doubt it, there will be people in her circles that would no doubt pay good money for that service.
 
‘A crucial legal document the Duke of York’s lawyer believes will stop the civil sex lawsuit against the royal will remain secret when arguments are made for the case to be thrown out.’

AND

US District Judge Lewis A Kaplan ruled the settlement agreement should not be opened after Andrew’s attorney asked for the document to remain sealed.’

I’m confused? I thought the sweatless-man’s people wanted to have the document available unsealed, as they believed it contained agreement not to pursue any cases against anyone else, including him, or something along those lines. Yet now they want it to remain sealed? Or is it a misprint in the story?

I’ve not followed it very closely but if someone could elaborate on where I’ve gone wrong in my understanding, I’d be grateful…
 
‘A crucial legal document the Duke of York’s lawyer believes will stop the civil sex lawsuit against the royal will remain secret when arguments are made for the case to be thrown out.’

AND

US District Judge Lewis A Kaplan ruled the settlement agreement should not be opened after Andrew’s attorney asked for the document to remain sealed.’

I’m confused? I thought the sweatless-man’s people wanted to have the document available unsealed, as they believed it contained agreement not to pursue any cases against anyone else, including him, or something along those lines. Yet now they want it to remain sealed? Or is it a misprint in the story?

I’ve not followed it very closely but if someone could elaborate on where I’ve gone wrong in my understanding, I’d be grateful…
While it may exonerate Prince Andrew of illegal behaviour with Virginia Giuffre, it could implicate him in other unsavoury &/or illegal activities.
If it was unsealed then journalists could runs stories on it and he'd then have to explain, "Virginia Giuffre is telling the truth about x, but not about y" which would be awkward.
 
Back
Top