Gaza genocide

Many will share your sentiments but the above is incorrect.

The Gaza Ministry of Health figures do not accord with this number and even so their figures have been disputed;

“The numbers are not real. That much is obvious to anyone who understands how naturally occurring numbers work. The casualties are not overwhelmingly women and children, and the majority may be Hamas fighters,” writes Abraham Wyner, a professor of statistics and data science at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and the report’s author.
That's from a notorious right wing Jewish publication called The Tablet. It just panders to the Israeli propaganda and contradicts what the UN and aid agencies in Gaza have seen on the ground irrespective of Hamas reports. Note he says " the majority MAY BE Hamas fighters" which is just a smear because he actually doesn't know anything about the facts re the casualties.
 
Without getting into the rights and wrongs of this conflict, Israel will not stop until their hostages have been released.
also, Israel doesn't care about the hostages, they could have an exchange months ago, but choose to attack
 
Where have you got that info from.
Hamas made an offer at the outset that was rejected by Israel.

also, historically. Hamas's goal in all it's attacks are to get hostages that they can use as leverage in exchange for Palestinian hostages.

If Israel wanted its hostages back it wouldn't have carpet bombed Gaza - the small strip of land where the hostages are being held.

Israel's (political) goal is obvious - destroy Gaza, get rid of Palestinians and claim the land for their own. It always has been! if you think they care about individual citizens, then you are fooling yourself.
 
Israel's (political) goal is obvious - destroy Gaza, get rid of Palestinians and claim the land for their own. It always has been!

Palestine's (political) goal is obvious - destroy Israel, get rid of Jews and claim the land for their own. It always has been!

Therein lies the problem.

Sooner or later - like (most of) the rest of the world has managed to do over the past few millennia - borders will be agreed. When and how remains to be seen, but perhaps not even within our lifetime.
 
Palestine's (political) goal is obvious - destroy Israel, get rid of Jews and claim the land for their own. It always has been!

Therein lies the problem.

Sooner or later - like (most of) the rest of the world has managed to do over the past few millennia - borders will be agreed. When and how remains to be seen, but perhaps not even within our lifetime.
incorrect, Palestine's ideal goal is to get rid of settlers and return the land to what it was - when Jews, Muslims and Christians lived (relatively) peacefully for centuries

There is no hatred of Jews - there is hatred of Settlers - who are Zionists - which is a political movement.

Palestinians will settle for an agreement based on Pre-67 (i.e. 1948) borders. But Israel (Zionist and right wing lead leaders) refuse this as they want to establish the ancient Land of Canaan.

The world has already agreed the Borders. The Palestinian representatives vote on it every year at the UN, and accept based on Pre-67 borders. Israel and the USA reject this along with a few small Islands.

There-in lies the Problem - Israel does not want peace, they want victory.
 
Many will share your sentiments but the above is incorrect.

The Gaza Ministry of Health figures do not accord with this number and even so their figures have been disputed;

“The numbers are not real. That much is obvious to anyone who understands how naturally occurring numbers work. The casualties are not overwhelmingly women and children, and the majority may be Hamas fighters,” writes Abraham Wyner, a professor of statistics and data science at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and the report’s author.

You've got this backwards IMO.

The death tolls released by Gaza in all previous conflicts have been corroborated by the UN, and in this conflict US and Israel officials have confirmed they're not an overstatement.

If anything because of the way Gaza count the dead its almost certainly a massive underestimate. They only count people who die in hospitals or bodies brought to hospitals and identified.

So anyone buried under the rubble isn't being counted. Given 50-60% of the buildings in Gaza have been destroyed how many people is that likely to be?

I've also read recently that something like 24 of 36 hospital and medical facilities in Gaza have been damaged by Israeli bombing so who knows how much they're able to carry on counting.
 
Oh yes there is!!!
if you keep pushing the false narrative that every Jew is a Zionist and every Jew is a Settler, then yes, you would be right!

But otherwise, you're talking BS!!!

Also, don't clip my replies for pathetic "sound bites"
it makes you look like a troll
 
Mr Maz, I've been on this board since the 1990s, I'm not a troll

Have a quick read of this so you're better informed
I don't need to read a partisan publication.

I am a Muslim, I have real-life experience and knowledge of the subject. I've lived in the Middle East so I also have that experience. I state facts, not narratives.

I also said that your action of picking a part of my reply, rather than full sentence makes you look like a troll, not that you are a Troll.
 
According to the UN. 85% of the Gaza population, 1.9 million have been displaced.
The numbers and statements coming out of elements within the Isreal government about resettlement outside of Gaza gave indications about the motives of some within it.

 
I don't need to read a partisan publication.

I am a Muslim, I have real-life experience and knowledge of the subject. I've lived in the Middle East so I also have that experience. I state facts, not narratives.

I also said that your action of picking a part of my reply, rather than full sentence makes you look like a troll, not that you are a Troll.

I suggest you read it so you can be better informed from a different viewpoint, because are you not partisan yourself?

Do you really state facts, or are you just offering personal experience?

Here are some proper facts for your consideration
 
I suggest you read it so you can be better informed from a different viewpoint, because are you not partisan yourself?

Do you really state facts, or are you just offering personal experience?

Here are some proper facts for your consideration
ahh, ok. so 1st hand experience is not as worthy as 3rd party. In case you didn't know, Personal Experience are facts - though you could argue that it's a very narrow view in some cases, but that's not the case with my knowledge.

I just read some of it, it does the typical bias of calling everything Anti-Zionist as Anti-semetic.

Considering this is a political issue and not a religious one, the reference is a bit pointless. However, as many of the examples referred to Anti-semetic stereotypes are actually Anti-Zionists, the article only mentions the word Zionism once.
 
ahh, ok. so 1st hand experience is not as worthy as 3rd party. In case you didn't know, Personal Experience are facts - though you could argue that it's a very narrow view in some cases, but that's not the case with my knowledge.

If we all used 1st hand experience as our factual base we'd all believe the world was flat.
 
Back
Top