Maybe so, but a totally different argument than needing to visit specsavers or that the minority of Eagle Eyed posters can't be wrong.
Yeah I didn’t say it was the only argument.
You could also add the lack of protest from the players.
The lack of complaint from Warnock.
The complete agreement from the EFL pundits / presenters.
The simple fact that if some people say they have seen something and others say the didn’t see it, it’s more likely that the event occurred and some people didn’t see it as opposed to some people just lying that they seen it.
Especially when the all of the people who saw it are Boro fans and are therefore unlikely to lie and say they saw it when they didn’t.