Only reason I’m advocating mate is because I have seen it. There is a video on Instagram one job on teeeside the account is called and if you zoom in you can see it touched his right foot and diverts towards the middle of the goal. I am sure Warnock will get asked about it again and clear it up. The decision not send Sorensen off though was shambolic. I am gutted as anyone about what happened with the penalty but I can’t not be honest. I have seen the ball hit his right foot. And as for Heam, I don’t think he’s a troll. He’s been a decent poster on here for a while.for those of you advocating the double touch, can you tell us where and how it occurs
because i just cannot see it. Block i usually agree with most things you say but cannot understand your so adamant on this. Heam im not too sure hes not a geordie troll .
Its clear from behind that he strikes the ball with his left foot as hes slipping, but his right foot slides under his left foot after hes struck it and makes no contact on the ball.
Im p****d that the referee makes that decision, Krull made no reaction until he saw the ref make his decision,.
Tav was dumbfounded hed slipped and did protest as did others but play carried on quickly so they had to get back into the game. The law is there to stop a player dribbling forward. He gained no advantage. As others have pointed out if the referee is applying the rules then equally retake as Krull off his line and also an infringement in the box.
All in all we can discuss it till the cows come home it will make no difference now. But it is an awful decision and smacks of nepotism. ( he also should have booked Sorenson for the blatant body check and then followed with a red ) that was even more blatant nepotism