You are right but they are trying to change and add to the transport network in the areaLooks like it will be very congested around it, a real bottleneck.
Hampden isn't as atmospheric as it was before the 1980s redevelopment but it still is brilliant and far better than any other stadium in that list.Hampden is a terrible, soulless football ground. Ibrox or Celtic Park would have been much better
I think the idea is we have the infrastructure in place rather than having to build loads of stadiums. In Brazil there were protests due to the spending on huge white elephants whilst half the country lived in poverty. Not that FIFA would give a ****. This well has already been tapped. There ain't a lot more money to squeeze out of people in the UK.
Hampden isn't as atmospheric as it was before the 1980s redevelopment but it still is brilliant and far better than any other stadium in that list.
Wembley? Etihad? Villa Park? You're having a laugh. I've been in noisier undertakers.
The game creates the atmosphere, the crowd respond.Fans create atmospheres, not stadia. They can all rock when the crowd is up for it.
It hasn't no. It's still not great. There are big bottlenecks at finsbury park. But there's not much you can do really. I didn't try using White Hart Lane station on the overgroundIsn’t transport getting away from Spurs stadium supposed to be a nightmare or has it improved now?
As things stand I have no desire to ever visit that stadium again.It hasn't no. It's still not great. There are big bottlenecks at finsbury park. But there's not much you can do really. I didn't try using White Hart Lane station on the overground