Dairy and meat exports down 96% due to Brexit

Called out by Smalltown on the internet?

🤣 **** me what a glorious day.

What's your plan to reverse brexit?
Can only conclude that ST thinks that pushing his message on a football message board is going to somehow have great sway with the general British public.
Maybe he goes on every footy message board ? Even though he has zero interest or knowledge about footy
 
Good post thanks, I agree with what you say, and as you say or I think you are saying, you can't have your cake and it eat.

Brexit and the election were of many things, some overlapping, some very distinct, lots of people voting with conviction of their main belief. People voted in the election as to how they choose fit and the same with Brexit and we get the results we deserve, given the entwined nature of both the election and Brexit I think it's very difficult to point a clear finger in one direction and say that's were the blame lies, it is too complex for that as you have articulated.
Thanks for that, and exactly, you can vote for something and be only 50% happy with it, and that might be better than the alternative if the alternative is 25%. Hardly anyone gets 100% of what they want from a party pre-vote, and even less if their party doesn't win its seat, the general election or they after they've been in power and start breaking "promises".

Too many on here think everything is stone-cold black and white, or something has to be certain or a fact, before it can be even considered and if it's not then it's automatically 50/50 in their eyes, which is nonsense.
 
Last edited:
What about T.May redlines don’t that mean it was never going to be a cu or sm Brexit. So anyone with any political knowledge must have know by the 2019 election it wasn’t going to be a soft Brexit. The last chance to stop Brexit and people on both sides voted for themselves.
Red lines? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: There are no red lines, everything is based on a foundation of lies, false hope and conning the gullable. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Cameron didn't think we would vote leave, which is why we got a brexit vote
Cameron didn't expect it to lose, so they spaffed the campaign
Cameron underestimated how stupid and gullable the nation is, which cost him his job in the end
May wanted a softer brexit, but couldn't work it, so had to change her first set of "red lines"
Boris then voted against May's "deal"
May then couldn't even stay in power
Then Boris broke the red lines, and made May's "deal" worse
The "deal" was then "over ready"...apparently
Turns out the "deal" wasn't really a deal, and wasn't "oven ready" either
During this Boris lied, lied again and again....and again and again
There were legal challenges, it could have collapsed, a few very different things could have happened, nothing was ever set in stone

But, yes, I agree the SM was unlikely, and CU also, but the Ireland situation could have kept us/ them in the EU and that could have kept the UK in and then that would have likely brought SM along with it. The only reason we didn't get that was because of the Irish sea border, which was also promised as "wouldn't happen", another "red line" so to speak.

So, having any trust or belief in that party is the ultimate fault, unless you're in a situation where none of that really matters, as no matter what, any/ all of that crap might be better for you than voting Labour (or for JC especially).

It might have been the last chance, and probably was, but it doesn't mean a hardcore tory (who was a remainer) is going to switch sides and go and support Corbyn, it's just not happening. Those types wouldn't even vote Blair or Starmer, they have blue blood even when the party is cut open.

As Boris is proving, there are loads of tories who don't give a toss what he/ the party does though, and it's likely they will keep voting blue, as no matter what they will always end up better off for it, or they at least think they will.

That doesn't mean they can't disagree with brexit though.

There's a good few that think this way, in order of priority
Con - Remain
Con - Leave
.
Lab - Remain
.
Lab - Remain, but with Corbyn
 
First it was "upset", then "bully", then "hypocrite" (being a pedant on spelling as well, so a bit of irony there), now its "calling people out" and "liar"

You only have to look at how he was received on (quite a few) other message boards to see how he always drags things down. Common denominator there, but of course anyone with "captain of the world" syndrome will attempt to paint it differently
You do come across a bit stalkerish here.....it's not necessary.

Argue against the points, not the poster.......if you can.
 
I'm not your little stalker. I just dislike you quite a bit, same as we all did when you turned up to come out with us many years ago, proper little cling-on. Even your 'mate' who you came with apologised in advance. You can't see your unpopularity though, such is your arrogance.

Enjoy your day getting admiring looks from people in your car. Just remember though, some of them will take one look at you and be thinking 'what a tît'
Wow, remind me not to go on a night out with you, you don't exactly sound like the greatest of company either.
 
You do come across a bit stalkerish here.....it's not necessary.

Argue against the points, not the poster.......if you can.
Your entitled to your view, but stalking surely would imply I follow all his posts surely. Look for the previous time I reacted to him. I try to ignore him but sometimes he posts something so ridiculous I can't help but bite

That being the case, I wonder whether it's time for me to not bother on here, it's being taken over by something I have a great dislike for, so maybe it's no longer the right forum for me
 
So, when defending Small Town and his decision to vote Tory, we can conclude that, talking of red lines, 10 yrs of austerity, spiralling child poverty, increased homelessness, the fact that the leader of the party is a lying, deceitful chancer...none of these were said red lines.

Or indeed was the one major electoral promise made. Get Brexit done, whatever the cost. Even though he is so vehemently opposed to it, and believes anyone who voted for it is as thick as pig muck. And tells them so. Often.

I can see why people don't take him seriously
 
Your entitled to your view, but stalking surely would imply I follow all his posts surely. Look for the previous time I reacted to him. I try to ignore him but sometimes he posts something so ridiculous I can't help but bite

That being the case, I wonder whether it's time for me to not bother on here, it's being taken over by something I have a great dislike for, so maybe it's no longer the right forum for me
Not really, there are part-time stalkers also.

I don't know him, unlike yourself, but to me, what he posts is mainly in line with factual data or predictions from those who seem to know most, or based on outcomes that are most probable, so they're not really ridiculous, certainly not to a remainer anyway, and there's lots of those. A dislike for him doesn't make his points less valid.

He also might post some things partially contradictory to what/ where he may have voted in the past (who knows), but it is only partial to some people (it's not partial for all), brexit is not the be-all and end-all of party voting, even if it was very temporarily one of the parties main objectives (and yet not a clear directional objective).

Also, people are allowed to change their mind, and in my opinion, it is better to change your mind to support the most accurate data, than to be stuck in your ways, or to keep walking down the wrong path, or digging the hole deeper and deeper.

Don't dislike then? Don't get wound up with what you disagree with, or stay away from politics. It's a heated topic in person and is even more heated on-line.
 
Thanks for that, and exactly, you can vote for something and be only 50% happy with it, and that might be better than the alternative if the alternative is 25%. Hardly anyone gets 100% of what they want from a party pre-vote, and even less if their party doesn't win its seat, the general election or they after they've been in power and start breaking "promises".

Too many on here think everything is stone-cold black and white, or something has to be certain or a fact, before it can be even considered and if it's not then it's automatically 50/50 in their eyes, which is nonsense.
But you can't vote for a party standing on a single issue, then insult people who openly supported that single issue, and not expect to be called a hypocrit.

That is the very reason I stopped reading your second reply to me, it ignores the primary issue on which ST posts. That's why I wasn't interested in the rest of your post.

It is a completely unbalanced view.

I have no problem engaging with ST on other topics, I don't know him so can't judge him. On this one subject he has absoloutely no right to name call, and yes he always starts it.

As you were Andy
 
But you can't vote for a party standing on a single issue, then insult people who openly supported that single issue, and not expect to be called a hypocrit.

That is the very reason I stopped reading your second reply to me, it ignores the primary issue on which ST posts. That's why I wasn't interested in the rest of your post.

It is a completely unbalanced view.

I have no problem engaging with ST on other topics, I don't know him so can't judge him. On this one subject he has absoloutely no right to name call, and yes he always starts it.

As you were Andy
You can and I've explained why. Many times now. Anyone who just says "you voted Tory" regardless of any issue I'm discussing is doing it deliberately now to attack me rather than address the issue. As I'm sick of pointing out that's the reason people are doing it. They can't or don't want to address whatever issue is discussed so it's just much easier to insult me. It's silly, not exactly grown up behaviour and adds nothing to the conversation. That's the world we live in though. Some would rather insult a person than discuss an issue
 
Not really, there are part-time stalkers also.

I don't know him, unlike yourself, but to me, what he posts is mainly in line with factual data or predictions from those who seem to know most, or based on outcomes that are most probable, so they're not really ridiculous, certainly not to a remainer anyway, and there's lots of those. A dislike for him doesn't make his points less valid.

He also might post some things partially contradictory to what/ where he may have voted in the past (who knows), but it is only partial to some people (it's not partial for all), brexit is not the be-all and end-all of party voting, even if it was very temporarily one of the parties main objectives (and yet not a clear directional objective).

Also, people are allowed to change their mind, and in my opinion, it is better to change your mind to support the most accurate data, than to be stuck in your ways, or to keep walking down the wrong path, or digging the hole deeper and deeper.

Don't dislike then? Don't get wound up with what you disagree with, or stay away from politics. It's a heated topic in person and is even more heated on-line.
It's far more about his condescending holier than thou attitude than what his views are and yes, some are valid. I sometimes like to discuss politics, not always, just sometimes and if I choose to post on a thread you can guarantee ST is there voicing his opinions as fact, insulting posters then crying about being insulted and bullied. He truly believes anyone who doesn't agree with him is attacking him. He bleats about wanting debate but you cannot debate an opinion with someone who basically just retorts with "you're wrong, I'm right"

And I don't know him, just had the misfortune of meeting him years ago
 
So, when defending Small Town and his decision to vote Tory, we can conclude that, talking of red lines, 10 yrs of austerity, spiralling child poverty, increased homelessness, the fact that the leader of the party is a lying, deceitful chancer...none of these were said red lines.

Or indeed was the one major electoral promise made. Get Brexit done, whatever the cost. Even though he is so vehemently opposed to it, and believes anyone who voted for it is as thick as pig muck. And tells them so. Often.

I can see why people don't take him seriously
If you're posting to me, can you use the quote, please? Anyway, assuming you are, I'm not defending anyone. I'm saying there might be 1000 reasons why people vote one way, and I've no idea of the 1000 for me, never mind anyone else, so I certainly wouldn't assume.

A lot of the tory policies are/ were crap, especially for certain groups, I'm not saying they aren't, that's why I don't vote tory. Although I have in the past and it would be more economical for me and my business if I did now, but I won't/ don't. Peoples opinions and priorities change, and some see that the economy might have suffered more with labour after the recession or with JC in 2019, even if we did remain. I'm not saying this is or isn't the case, as I can't say what labour would have done.

We were likely leaving anyway, whether the Tories or Labour got in, and the combined probability of both was probably over 90% leave, from what the markets were saying. It's possibly also irrelevant who you vote for, if you know labour were going to take a beating anyway? So you could use the vote tactically, locally. I don't think anyone had confidence in JC making us remain, even if he fully campaigned for that (which he didn't) and had the ability to win the election (which he didn't).

Could be a case of you don't like JC, want him out, don't think labour will win, so you vote tory to help your personal circumstances or you might just like the tory MP and hope by getting a Tory MP you get looked after better if/ when the inevitable Brexit happens? I'm not saying that's what did happen, but it certainly could. I F***ing hate the current tories, they're miles worse than they were 10 years ago, 2 years ago or even 5 years ago, but it doesn't mean I would vote against the TVM, Ben Houchen, for example.

"get brexit done" didn't mean much, just like most of the leave false promises which enver/ won't materialise, maybe he thought the tories couldn't/ wouldn't deliver it? Also, the slogan didn't include "whatever the cost", the tories also tried to hide what the economic cost would be, behind a reliance on the hate of immigrants etc.

Statistically more people with higher education/ qualifications voted remain, as do more that are in uni/ etc, same as nurses, doctors, teachers, financial workers, all mostly need good (above average) education, all mostly voted remain doesn't mean that all brexiters are "thick as pig muck", but it doesn't mean that some aren't either. Same as there are some remainers who are also "thick as pig muck".

You can call people thick though if they are thick, you can also call them thick if they aren't, it's an opinion I suppose. But you can gather what sort of grasp some people have on reality, by what they post, if it's devoid of fact, reason or has any sort of quality backing then they may not be the most in touch.

I think the brexiters just all find him annoying and relentless, and may also see him as being hypocritical, which is their choice, but it's not that simple. But it's hard to disagree with the posts he makes, which is why it seems to me that more go after him personally, before going after debating the posts. Maybe just focus on the posts, block him or don't read it?
 
Last edited:
It's far more about his condescending holier than thou attitude than what his views are and yes, some are valid. I sometimes like to discuss politics, not always, just sometimes and if I choose to post on a thread you can guarantee ST is there voicing his opinions as fact, insulting posters then crying about being insulted and bullied. He truly believes anyone who doesn't agree with him is attacking him. He bleats about wanting debate but you cannot debate an opinion with someone who basically just retorts with "you're wrong, I'm right"

And I don't know him, just had the misfortune of meeting him years ago
Even if he's being condescending, it doesn't make him wrong either though, but it does get a few peoples backs up. People shouldn't get wound up so easy, easier said than done mind.

From an outside perspective, it does seem like he's getting attacked (by a group), before he starts complaining of being attacked though. Mostly it's not about posts, even at the start, it's personal, from the start, which is the problem.

Anyway, had enough of this now, but people do need to realise someone can have strong views on a single subject, yet the accumulation of multiple views on multiple subjects can make the vote contradict one main policy. I know it as I've done it, a few times, and it happens quite often from those in the centre.
Couple that with the opposition having a seemingly poor leader, a practical certain "leave" no matter what/ who was in charge and also local tactical voting, then there are even more things that complicate things.

Everyone thinks they're right, mostly, especially on a forum, I know I do!
 
Another Brexit triumph today as the UK has lost access to Norwegian fishing waters. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56932551

R97a90605ba727c00725ab63c8ade3db8

or...
FISHERMANS-FRIEND-MULTI-PACK-3-X-25G-767880.jpg

Vote now...
 
Why haven't these Fishermen made another protest journey up the Thames to dump some more fish?
 
Another Brexit triumph today as the UK has lost access to Norwegian fishing waters. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56932551

R97a90605ba727c00725ab63c8ade3db8

or...
FISHERMANS-FRIEND-MULTI-PACK-3-X-25G-767880.jpg

Vote now...

The Norwegians seem pretty happy with the result

'Lord Nelson
Lord Beaverbrook
Sir Winston Churchill
Sir Anthony Eden
Clement Atlee
Henry Cooper
Lady Diana
Maggie Thatcher
Can you hear me?
Can you hear me?
Nigel Farage
Boris Johnson
Your boys took a helluva beating!'
 
Back
Top