Their submission was under the cap. They've tried to hide over $5m.They’ll get a fine and wind tunnel time reduction which seems about right if the $1.8m is correct.
You got a link to this?Their submission was under the cap. They've tried to hide over $5m.
RB's submission was $4.5m under the cap but the FIA has made its assessment at $1.8m over.You got a link to this?
I'm not so sure: The 2023 car will already benefit from developments made over the cost cap. It's like telling Ben Johnson: Ok so you can keep your gold medal from Seoul, but you have to run in Barcelona with a stone in your shoe.They’ll get a fine and wind tunnel time reduction which seems about right if the $1.8m is correct.
Yeah that's the sad thing isn't it? He's super, super quick. and he's fearless and, as the last 8 races have shown, he's consistent. It's just a shame his first world championship was severely tainted and even his second has some of it's shine missingMax is a good driver, but both of his Championships have massive * next to them.
* Masi
* Cost cap
Oh yeah I already read that, that is quite a stretch but fair play to you for having a goRB's submission was $4.5m under the cap but the FIA has made its assessment at $1.8m over.
So RB has effectively tried to hide $6.3m of expenditure.
That's fraud.
Red Bull and FIA edging towards Formula 1 cost cap conclusion at Mexico City GP
Red Bull and FIA have been in talks since team were accused of going over 2021s $145m cost cap on October 10; announcement on accepted breach agreement and punishment expected on Friday afternoon UK time; Red Bull set to be handed minor sporting penaltywww.skysports.com
Honestly it seems you post to provoke these days. When you are being genuine and not provoking you are a good posters. Why single out zorro when starting a threadNot a great day for Zorro and Maxettes. Red Bull have finally admitted to their financial doping.
Makes let’s years championship even more of a mockery than it already was.
Horner has a brass neck and never feels uncomfortable, never seems to notice his own hypocrisy. He will probably say that the penalty was harsh on his poor little underdog team.No doubt Sky Sports will really scrutinise Horner this weekend and make him feel uncomfortable with their questions
Every team knew what the rules were. The FIA even trialled the process for the 2020 season.Oh yeah I already read that, that is quite a stretch but fair play to you for having a go
I don’t: despite you trying to make this a “thing” the reason I singled out zorro is obvious: the graceless way he supports on driver and insult another and can’t even acknowledge all the cheating and manipulation that happened to make him a championHonestly it seems you post to provoke these days. When you are being genuine and not provoking you are a good posters. Why single out zorro when starting a thread
Yeah something about kids being bullied, lowly can sellers v big auto, some other lie.Horner has a brass neck and never feels uncomfortable, never seems to notice his own hypocrisy. He will probably say that the penalty was harsh on his poor little underdog team.
Because they believe some of costs they didn’t include shouldn’t have been in the budget and they didn’t leave enough of a buffer with the $4m they left to keep them under. It doesn’t have to be fraud or financial doping, it can just be misinterpretation or disagreement about the rules.Every team knew what the rules were. The FIA even trialled the process for the 2020 season.
Other than a couple of procedural breaches how is it that 9 teams managed to comply with the cost cap yet only Red Bull couldn't?
It’s deliberately provocative to bring a new post about current affairs and bring a poster into itI don’t: despite you trying to make this a “thing” the reason I singled out zorro is obvious: the graceless way he supports on driver and insult another and can’t even acknowledge all the cheating and manipulation that happened to make him a champion